Masked form priming with extreme transposition

Using eight-letter words, masked form-priming is examined with more extreme versions of transposed primes than are normally considered. Strong priming effects are observed when as few as two out of eight letters are correctly positioned within the prime, indicating that the word recognition system is surprisingly flexible with regard to letter position. Three prominent models of letter position coding are considered in light of the observed data. The comparison between models focuses on the assumptions and mechanisms within each. Strengths and weaknesses are identified for all approaches. Some evidence is found in support of differential weighting of letter positions, although the more specific question of whether it is exterior or initial letters that are most crucial to word recognition remains unresolved.

[1]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. , 1995 .

[4]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the importance of letter pairs in reading-parafoveal processing is not the only view: reply to Inhoff, Radach, Eiter, and Skelly (2003). , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[8]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. , 2000, Psychological review.

[9]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Christine Guerrera Flexibility and constraint in lexical access: Explorations in transposed-letter priming , 2004 .

[11]  R S Berndt,et al.  A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[12]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[13]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[15]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[16]  M. Coltheart,et al.  358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Perception of multiple objects - a connectionist approach , 1991, Neural network modeling and connectionism.

[19]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[20]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[21]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[24]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[25]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.