Distance Semantics for Relevance-Sensitive Belief Revision

Possible-world semantics are provided for Parikh's relevance-sensitive model for belief revision. Having Grove's system-of-spheres construction as a base, we consider additional constraints on measuring distance between possible worlds, and we prove that, in the presence of the AGM postulates, these constraints characterize precisely Parikh's axiom (P). These additional constraints essentially generalize a criterion of similarity that predates axiom (P) and was originally introduced in the context of Reasoning about Action. A by-product of our study is the identification of two possible readings of Parikh's axiom (P), which we call the strong and the weak versions of the axiom. An interesting feature of the strong version is that, unlike classical AGM belief revision, it makes associations between the revision policies of different theories.

[1]  Alexander Borgida,et al.  Language features for flexible handling of exceptions in information systems , 1985, TODS.

[2]  Mukesh Dalal,et al.  Investigations into a Theory of Knowledge Base Revision , 1988, AAAI.

[3]  Marianne Winslett,et al.  Reasoning about Action Using a Possible Models Approach , 1988, AAAI.

[4]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment , 1988, TARK.

[5]  R. Parikh Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages , 1999 .

[6]  Ken Satoh Nonmonotonic Reasoning by Minimal Belief Revision , 1988, FGCS.

[7]  Adam J. Grove,et al.  Two modellings for theory change , 1988, J. Philos. Log..

[8]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  An Inconsistency Tolerant Model for Belief Representation and Belief Revision , 1999, IJCAI.

[9]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  Relevance Sensitive Non-Monotonic Inference on Belief Sequences , 2000, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[10]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  Relevance sensitive belief structures , 2000, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[11]  Norman Y. Foo,et al.  Measuring similarity in belief revision , 2000, J. Log. Comput..

[12]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[13]  Karl Schlechta,et al.  Distance semantics for belief revision , 1996, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  Pavlos Peppas,et al.  On the Use of Epistemic Entrenchment in Reasoning about Action , 1992, ECAI.