Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members’ experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.

[1]  Jeffrey K. Springston,et al.  Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial. , 2021, Preventive medicine.

[2]  Alison B. Hamilton,et al.  Measuring Community‐Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review , 2020, The Milbank quarterly.

[3]  L. Forsythe,et al.  What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings , 2019, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[4]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Engaging Patients and Other Non-Researchers in Health Research: Defining Research Engagement , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research , 2018, Journal of general internal medicine.

[6]  M. Cramer,et al.  Community Advisory Board Members’ Perspectives Regarding Opportunities and Challenges of Research Collaboration , 2018, Western journal of nursing research.

[7]  N. Hanna,et al.  Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[8]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , 2017, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  Susan Sheridan,et al.  The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research , 2017, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[10]  Arleen F. Brown,et al.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community–Academic Research Partnerships , 2017, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[11]  S. Christy,et al.  Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening. , 2015, Health education research.

[12]  S. Clauser,et al.  Patient Centeredness and Engagement in Quality-of-Care Oncology Research. , 2015, Journal of oncology practice.

[13]  Emily Moore,et al.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[14]  Anne C. Beal,et al.  Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[15]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  L. Leslie,et al.  A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  Christina M Getrich,et al.  Cultivating a Cycle of Trust With Diverse Communities in Practice-Based Research: A Report From PRIME Net , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[18]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  M. Isler,et al.  Practical Steps to Community Engaged Research: From Inputs to Outcomes , 2012, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[20]  Jeffrey K. Springston,et al.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans. , 2012, Health education research.

[21]  G. Magwood,et al.  Community Advisory Boards in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Synthesis of Best Processes , 2011, Preventing chronic disease.

[22]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[23]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Practice-based Research is Community Engagement , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[24]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities , 2006, Health promotion practice.

[26]  B. Israel,et al.  Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships , 2003 .