Supporting air traffic control collaboration with a TableTop system

Collaboration is key to safety and efficiency in Air Traffic Control. Legacy paper-based systems enable seamless and non-verbal collaboration, but trends in new software and hardware for ATC tend to separate controllers more and more, which hinders collaboration. This paper presents a new interactive system designed to support collaboration in ATC. We ran a series of interviews and workshops to identify collaborative situations in ATC. From this analysis, we derived a set of requirements to support collaboration: support mutual awareness, communication and coordination, dynamic task allocation and simultaneous use with more than two people. We designed a set of new interactive tools to fulfill the requirements, by using a multi-user tabletop surface, appropriate feedthrough, and reified and partially-accomplishable actions. Preliminary evaluation shows that feedthrough is important, users benefit from a number of tools to communicate and coordinate their actions, and the tabletop is actually usable by three people both in tightly coupled tasks and parallel, individual activities. At a higher level, we also found that co-location is not enough to generate mutual awareness if users are not engaged in meaningful collaboration.

[1]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays , 2006, CHI.

[2]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Transforming the NAS: The Next Generation Air Traffic Control System , 2013 .

[3]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[4]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[5]  Darren Leigh,et al.  DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology , 2001, UIST '01.

[6]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[7]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[8]  Stéphane Chatty,et al.  Pushing the limits of ATC user interface design beyond S&M interaction: the DigiStrips experience , 2000 .

[9]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Fluid integration of rotation and translation , 2005, CHI.

[10]  P. Ky,et al.  SESAR : towards the new generation of air traffic management systems in Europe , 2006 .

[11]  Lionel Médini,et al.  Reinventing the familiar: exploring an augmented reality design space for air traffic control , 1998, CHI.

[12]  Stéphane Chatty,et al.  Improving Users' Comprehension of Changes with Animation and Sound: An Empirical Assessment , 2007, INTERACT.

[13]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[14]  Stéphane Chatty,et al.  Pen computing for air traffic control , 1996, CHI.

[15]  Stéphane Chatty,et al.  How Can Groupware Preserve our Coordination Skills? Designing for Direct Collaboration , 1999, INTERACT.

[16]  Laurence Rognin,et al.  Cooperation, reliability of socio-technical systems and allocation of function , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control , 1992, CSCW '92.

[18]  Laurent Karsenty,et al.  Communications distantes en situation de travail : favoriser l'établissement d'un contexte mutuellement partagé , 2008 .

[19]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[20]  Marcel Leroux,et al.  The Role of Multimodal Communication in Cooperation: The Cases of Air Traffic Control , 1995, Multimodal Human-Computer Communication.

[21]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Guest Editors' Introduction: Interacting with Digital Tabletops , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[22]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control , 1999, TCHI.

[23]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.