Excimer Laser Smoothing of Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts

Purpose To use excimer laser smoothing passes to reshape Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) endothelial grafts and to evaluate the effect on the donor endothelium. Methods The stromal surface of microkeratome-cut DSAEK grafts was smoothed using excimer laser smoothing passes with masking fluid. Excimer laser hyperopic ablation was used to improve the uniformity of graft thickness within the optical zone. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography was used to measure endothelial graft pachymetry, plan ablations, and evaluate donor contour. Vital dye staining was performed to assess endothelial cell damage. Scanning electron microscopy images of stromal surfaces were graded on a 5-point scale by masked observers to evaluate surface roughness. Results Four grafts underwent excimer laser smoothing. Vital dye staining showed no endothelial damage. Microkeratome-cut surfaces treated with laser smoothing (mean grade = 2.04) were smoother than nonsmoothed microkeratome-cut surfaces (mean grade = 4.07; P < 0.01), surfaces that underwent dry laser ablation (mean grade = 3.63; P < 0.01) and manually dissected interfaces (mean grade = 4.75; P < 0.0001). No difference was observed between stromal beds created by peeling Descemet membrane (mean grade = 1.64) compared with surfaces produced by microkeratome cutting followed by laser smoothing (mean grade = 2.04; P = 0.14). One graft underwent combined excimer smoothing and peripheral hyperopic ablation. The center–periphery thickness difference was 15 &mgr;m before ablation and 4 &mgr;m afterward. Conclusions Laser smoothing passes can be used to improve the contour and smoothness of DSAEK grafts without damaging donor endothelial cells. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether reshaping donors using excimer laser can deliver improved visual outcomes after DSAEK.

[1]  小林 顕 Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) , 2011 .

[2]  David A. Price,et al.  Secondary graft failure and repeat endothelial keratoplasty after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[3]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Terry Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon. , 2009, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[5]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[6]  M. Terry,et al.  Stability of hyperopic refractive shift following Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty: vision, endothelial survival, and complications in a comparative case series of fellows vs attending surgeons. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  I. Bahar,et al.  Retrospective Contralateral Study Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2009, Cornea.

[9]  M. Terry,et al.  Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[10]  L. Spadea,et al.  Excimer laser–assisted lamellar keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of keratoconus , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  An Easy and Inexpensive Method for Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Damage by Using Vital Dye Staining and Adobe Photoshop Software , 2008, Cornea.

[12]  K. Goins,et al.  Eye bank survey of surgeons using precut donor tissue for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, Cornea.

[13]  M. Terry,et al.  Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Six-month Results in a Prospective Study of 100 Eyes , 2008, Cornea.

[14]  M. Moshirfar,et al.  Corneal profile analysis after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and its relationship to postoperative hyperopic shift , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  D. B. Tran,et al.  Comparative Study of Stromal Bed Quality by Using Mechanical, IntraLase Femtosecond Laser 15- and 30-kHz Microkeratomes , 2007, Cornea.

[16]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Terry,et al.  Histology of Dislocations in Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): A Laboratory-Based, Surgical Solution to Dislocation in 100 Consecutive DSEK Cases , 2006, Cornea.

[18]  H. Lubatschowski,et al.  [Excimer laser treatment in deep lamellar keratoplasty 100 micrometer over Descemet's membrane]. , 2002, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[19]  W S Kim,et al.  Corneal Hydration Affects Ablation During Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Surgery , 2001, Cornea.

[20]  W. Hütz,et al.  [Lamellar keratoplasty with the excimer laser. Initial clinical results]. , 1996, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.