New Insights into the Phenotype Switching of Melanoma

Simple Summary Late-stage melanoma is one of the leading causes of death from skin cancers, as it frequently acquires resistance to standard therapies. Melanoma aggressiveness relies both on high intratumoral heterogeneity and on the capability of melanoma cells to switch among different differentiation phenotypes. Recently, melanoma plasticity has indeed been pinpointed as a main cause of resistance to standard therapies. Melanoma takes advantage of extrinsic reprogramming, a common feature exploited also by melanocytes, to promote tumor progression. Unfortunately, extrinsic factors and molecular mechanisms driving phenotype switching upon treatment are yet to be thoroughly characterized. The aim of this review is to support this field of research by providing brand-new insights into melanoma plasticity. Starting from the origin of phenotype switching, we will report up-to-date molecular players and extrinsic factors determining different transcriptional programs. Finally, the latest therapeutic strategies to tackle this mechanism of resistance will be discussed. Abstract Melanoma is considered one of the deadliest skin cancers, partly because of acquired resistance to standard therapies. The most recognized driver of resistance relies on acquired melanoma cell plasticity, or the ability to dynamically switch among differentiation phenotypes. This confers the tumor noticeable advantages. During the last year, two new features have been included in the hallmarks of cancer, namely “Unlocking phenotypic plasticity” and “Non-mutational epigenetic reprogramming”. Such are inextricably intertwined as, most of the time, plasticity is not discernable at the genetic level, as it rather consists of epigenetic reprogramming heavily influenced by external factors. By analyzing current literature, this review provides reasoning about the origin of plasticity and clarifies whether such features already exist among tumors or are acquired by selection. Moreover, markers of plasticity, molecular effectors, and related tumor advantages in melanoma will be explored. Ultimately, as this new branch of tumor biology opened a wide landscape of therapeutic possibilities, in the final paragraph of this review, we will focus on newly characterized drugs targeting melanoma plasticity.

[1]  S. Corre,et al.  The AhR‐SRC axis as a therapeutic vulnerability in BRAFi‐resistant melanoma , 2022, EMBO molecular medicine.

[2]  Y. Saeys,et al.  A cellular hierarchy in melanoma uncouples growth and metastasis , 2022, Nature.

[3]  Rita Cabrita,et al.  DNA promoter hypermethylation of melanocyte lineage genes determines melanoma phenotype , 2022, JCI insight.

[4]  R. Dummer,et al.  Loss of YY1, a Regulator of Metabolism in Melanoma, Drives Melanoma Cell Invasiveness and Metastasis Formation , 2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[5]  Gaurav Kumar,et al.  Targeting SOX10-deficient cells to reduce the dormant-invasive phenotype state in melanoma , 2022, Nature Communications.

[6]  J. Wargo,et al.  Mechanisms of immune activation and regulation: lessons from melanoma , 2022, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  D. Hanahan Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. , 2022, Cancer discovery.

[8]  Samantha J. Stehbens,et al.  Persister state-directed transitioning and vulnerability in melanoma , 2020, Nature Communications.

[9]  M. Fallahi-Sichani,et al.  AP-1 transcription factor network explains diverse patterns of cellular plasticity in melanoma cells , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  Jun S. Song,et al.  SOX10 Regulates Melanoma Immunogenicity through an IRF4–IRF1 Axis , 2021, Cancer Research.

[11]  S. D. del Rincón,et al.  Melanoma Plasticity: Promoter of Metastasis and Resistance to Therapy , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[12]  L. Kemény,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity of melanocytes derived from human adult skin , 2021, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[13]  R. Dummer,et al.  Epigenetic control of melanoma cell invasiveness by the stem cell factor SALL4 , 2021, Nature Communications.

[14]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Evolutionary predictability of genetic versus nongenetic resistance to anticancer drugs in melanoma. , 2021, Cancer cell.

[15]  C. Goding,et al.  MITF induces escape from innate immunity in melanoma , 2021, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[16]  M. Fallahi-Sichani,et al.  Epigenetic modulation reveals differentiation state specificity of oncogene addiction , 2020, Nature Communications.

[17]  G. Mills,et al.  Targeting Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Restores BRAF Inhibitor Sensitivity in BRAFi-resistant Melanoma , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Reversal of pre-existing NGFR-driven tumor and immune therapy resistance , 2020, Nature Communications.

[19]  S. Aerts,et al.  Robust gene expression programs underlie recurrent cell states and phenotype switching in melanoma , 2020, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  K. Irvine,et al.  Integration of Hippo-YAP Signaling with Metabolism. , 2020, Developmental cell.

[21]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma (IMspire150): primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2020, The Lancet.

[22]  J. Wilmott,et al.  Transcriptional downregulation of MHC class I and melanoma de- differentiation in resistance to PD-1 inhibition , 2020, Nature Communications.

[23]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Update on tolerability and overall survival in COLUMBUS: landmark analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib vs vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[24]  A. Osterman,et al.  Lineage-Restricted Regulation of SCD and Fatty Acid Saturation by MITF Controls Melanoma Phenotypic Plasticity. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[25]  J. Marine,et al.  Melanoma plasticity and phenotypic diversity: therapeutic barriers and opportunities , 2019, Genes & development.

[26]  C. Wellbrock,et al.  Phenotype plasticity as enabler of melanoma progression and therapy resistance , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  G. Nicolini,et al.  An actionable axis linking NFATc2 to EZH2 controls the EMT-like program of melanoma cells , 2019, Oncogene.

[28]  R. Sturm,et al.  BRN2, a POUerful driver of melanoma phenotype switching and metastasis , 2018, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[29]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Toward Minimal Residual Disease-Directed Therapy in Melanoma , 2018, Cell.

[30]  T. Graeber,et al.  Multi-stage Differentiation Defines Melanoma Subtypes with Differential Vulnerability to Drug-Induced Iron-Dependent Oxidative Stress. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[31]  Zhi Wei,et al.  Co‐targeting BET and MEK as salvage therapy for MAPK and checkpoint inhibitor‐resistant melanoma , 2018, EMBO molecular medicine.

[32]  Charles H. Yoon,et al.  Antibody-mediated inhibition of MICA and MICB shedding promotes NK cell–driven tumor immunity , 2018, Science.

[33]  C. Wellbrock,et al.  Collagen abundance controls melanoma phenotypes through lineage-specific microenvironment sensing , 2018, Oncogene.

[34]  Demetrios A. Spandidos,et al.  Cutaneous melanoma: From pathogenesis to therapy (Review) , 2018, International journal of oncology.

[35]  Linda T. Nieman,et al.  Molecular signatures of circulating melanoma cells for monitoring early response to immune checkpoint therapy , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  P. Parren,et al.  Cooperative targeting of melanoma heterogeneity with an AXL antibody-drug conjugate and BRAF/MEK inhibitors , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[37]  T. Graeber,et al.  Single-cell analysis resolves the cell state transition and signaling dynamics associated with melanoma drug-induced resistance , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  R. Dummer,et al.  The low affinity neurotrophin receptor CD271 regulates phenotype switching in melanoma , 2017, Nature Communications.

[39]  J. Utikal,et al.  New role of ID3 in melanoma adaptive drug-resistance , 2017, Oncotarget.

[40]  A. Ribas,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006) , 2017, The Lancet.

[41]  H. Clevers,et al.  Cancer stem cells revisited , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[42]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  E. Rozeman,et al.  Cancer Drug Addiction is Relayed by an ERK2-Dependent Phenotype Switch , 2017, Nature.

[44]  Hannah E Seberg,et al.  Beyond MITF: Multiple transcription factors directly regulate the cellular phenotype in melanocytes and melanoma , 2017, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[45]  D. Lipsker,et al.  MITF-High and MITF-Low Cells and a Novel Subpopulation Expressing Genes of Both Cell States Contribute to Intra- and Intertumoral Heterogeneity of Primary Melanoma , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[46]  Reinhard Dummer,et al.  Targeting endothelin receptor signalling overcomes heterogeneity driven therapy failure , 2017, EMBO molecular medicine.

[47]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance , 2017, Nature.

[48]  C. Berking,et al.  The AP-1 transcription factor FOSL1 causes melanocyte reprogramming and transformation , 2017, Oncogene.

[49]  C. Wellbrock,et al.  Glucose availability controls ATF4-mediated MITF suppression to drive melanoma cell growth , 2017, Oncotarget.

[50]  Matthew J. Daniels,et al.  Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma , 2017, Genes & development.

[51]  Matthew Wongchenko,et al.  Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[52]  B. Bastian,et al.  From melanocytes to melanomas , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[53]  K. Tsai,et al.  Comparative profiles of BRAF inhibitors: the paradox index as a predictor of clinical toxicity , 2016, Oncotarget.

[54]  R. Dummer,et al.  The Genetic Evolution of Melanoma from Precursor Lesions. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[55]  J. Landsberg,et al.  MITF and c-Jun antagonism interconnects melanoma dedifferentiation with pro-inflammatory cytokine responsiveness and myeloid cell recruitment , 2015, Nature Communications.

[56]  D. Gautheret,et al.  New Functional Signatures for Understanding Melanoma Biology from Tumor Cell Lineage-Specific Analysis , 2015, Cell reports.

[57]  Antonio Rosato,et al.  Genome-wide association between YAP/TAZ/TEAD and AP-1 at enhancers drives oncogenic growth , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[58]  J. Utikal,et al.  Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[59]  A. Pisco,et al.  Non-genetic cancer cell plasticity and therapy-induced stemness in tumour relapse: ‘What does not kill me strengthens me' , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[60]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Intravital Imaging Reveals How BRAF Inhibition Generates Drug-Tolerant Microenvironments with High Integrin β1/FAK Signaling , 2015, Cancer cell.

[61]  M. Mihm,et al.  BAP1 and BRAFV600E expression in benign and malignant melanocytic proliferations. , 2015, Human pathology.

[62]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[63]  E. Sahai,et al.  Intravital imaging of SRF and Notch signalling identifies a key role for EZH2 in invasive melanoma cells , 2014, Oncogene.

[64]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[65]  Dirk Schadendorf,et al.  Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[66]  P. Lorigan,et al.  Prevalence and heterogeneity of circulating tumour cells in metastatic cutaneous melanoma , 2014, Melanoma research.

[67]  Robert P. Jenkins,et al.  Mechano-transduction and YAP-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer associated fibroblasts , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[68]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Cell plasticity and heterogeneity in cancer. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[69]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Melanomas resist T-cell therapy through inflammation-induced reversible dedifferentiation , 2012, Nature.

[70]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[71]  K. Flaherty,et al.  RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[72]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[74]  Elke Hacker,et al.  Melanoma cell invasiveness is regulated by miR‐211 suppression of the BRN2 transcription factor , 2011, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[75]  S. Lowe,et al.  AXL receptor kinase is a mediator of YAP-dependent oncogenic functions in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2011, Oncogene.

[76]  S. Morrison,et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity among tumorigenic melanoma cells from patients that is reversible and not hierarchically organized. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[77]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances T-cell recognition of melanoma without affecting lymphocyte function. , 2010, Cancer research.

[78]  P. Nuciforo,et al.  Brn-2 represses microphthalmia-associated transcription factor expression and marks a distinct subpopulation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor-negative melanoma cells. , 2008, Cancer research.

[79]  Stephen B Gruber,et al.  BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma and melanocytic nevi , 2006, Melanoma research.

[80]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[81]  J. Shay,et al.  BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi , 2005, Nature.

[82]  P. C. Joshi,et al.  EVALUATION OF UV-RADIATION INDUCED SINGLET OXYGEN GENERATION POTENTIAL OF SELECTED DRUGS , 2002, Drug and chemical toxicology.

[83]  D. Moore Drug-Induced Cutaneous Photosensitivity , 2002 .

[84]  N. Sampas,et al.  Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling , 2000, Nature.

[85]  Z. Chao Adverse drug reactions. , 1991, Occasional paper.

[86]  M. A. Everett,et al.  The relationship between tyrosinase activity and skin color in human foreskins. , 1990, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[87]  T. Kapur Drug-induced photosensitivity , 1982 .