Methodological Approaches to Measuring the Effects of Implementation of Health Information Technology (HIT)

The research design, evaluation methodology, and statistical analysis of the clinical efficacy of healthcare information technology (HIT) implementation can be a challenging task. Much of the research to date involves weakly designed studies. We discuss some of the more rudimentary experimental designs and analytical approaches that have typically been used. Approaches to strengthen a research design include: adding a matched control unit or hospital; using multiple observations before and after the HIT implementation; making observations across a number of hospitals that are implementing the same HIT application; comparing the changes in these hospitals to a matched set that have not yet implemented the HIT application; and applying statistical approaches that permit changes in trends over time to be examined. Here we report our use of linear piecewise spline mixed effects models and compare our models to other methodological approaches that could be used for this evaluation.

[1]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. , 2001, JAMA.

[3]  R. Wachter,et al.  Safe but sound: patient safety meets evidence-based medicine. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Physician order entry in U.S. hospitals , 1998, AMIA.

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events , 1995, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  R C Littell,et al.  Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Jane M. Brokel,et al.  Redesigning care delivery through health IT implementation. Exploring Trinity Health's IT model. , 2007, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[9]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. , 2000 .

[10]  T. Brennan,et al.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Judith D. Singer,et al.  Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models , 1998 .

[12]  S. Michael Handbook in research and evaluation , 1971 .

[13]  T. Brennan,et al.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. , 2000, Medical care.

[14]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[15]  T. Massaro,et al.  Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center: II. Impact on Medical Education , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  Nan M. Laird,et al.  Using the General Linear Mixed Model to Analyse Unbalanced Repeated Measures and Longitudinal Data , 1997 .

[19]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[20]  I. Higginson,et al.  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs , 2011 .

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  J. Grossman,et al.  Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership , 2005 .