New estimates of the cost of capital for pharmaceutical firms

Academic researchers, as well as pharmaceutical firms themselves, often use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to estimate a firm's cost of capital. But the CAPM implicitly assumes that cash flows follow a random walk. This assumption is inconsistent with our finding that large U.S.-based pharmaceutical firms' cash flow growth rates display either momentum or mean-reversion. We show that growth rate momentum implies: (1) the systematic risk of a project increases monotonically with time to maturity of the cash flows; and (2) longer duration projects require a higher cost of capital. One of the practical implications of our results is that the traditional CAPM underestimates the cost of capital for some pharmaceutical firms by as much as 2.8%. These findings are quite relevant for the policy debate about the high rates of return earned by pharmaceutical companies, which some claim are pure rents and are not necessary to attract investors. Our theoretical and empirical analysis shows that high returns are often required to compensate for the higher systematic risk of long-duration pharmaceutical cash flows.

[1]  Sam Peltzman,et al.  An Evaluation of Consumer Protection Legislation: The 1962 Drug Amendments , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[3]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  Pioneers, Imitators, and Generics — a Simulation Model of Schumpeterian Competition , 1987 .

[4]  C. Lewis,et al.  The determinants of market-wide issue cycles for initial public offerings☆ , 2008 .

[5]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  A New Look at the Returns and Risks to Pharmaceutical R&D , 1990 .

[6]  Wayne E. Ferson,et al.  Finite sample properties of the generalized method of moments in tests of conditional asset pricing models , 1994 .

[7]  E. Fama,et al.  Industry costs of equity , 1997 .

[8]  J. Vernon,et al.  Pharmaceutical Stock Price Reactions to Price Constraint Threats and Firm-Level R&D Spending , 2005 .

[9]  Pharmaceutical R&D Spending and Threats of Price Regulation , 2008 .

[10]  B. Malkiel,et al.  Investigating the Behavior of Idiosyncratic Volatility , 2001 .

[11]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[12]  Kristin E. Fink,et al.  IPO Vintage and the Rise of Idiosyncratic Risk , 2005 .

[13]  J. M. Hammersley,et al.  Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices , 1971 .

[14]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  The Economic Value of Medical Research , 2000 .

[15]  Beta Estimation with Stock Return Outliers: The Case of U.S. Pharmaceutical Companies , 2009 .

[16]  J. DiMasi,et al.  The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? , 2007 .

[17]  S. Chib,et al.  Bayes inference in regression models with ARMA (p, q) errors , 1994 .

[18]  Eugene F. Fama,et al.  New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates , 2004 .

[19]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Measuring the Gains from Medical Research , 2010 .

[20]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[21]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[22]  Carmelo Giaccotto,et al.  Drug Prices and Research and Development Investment Behavior in the Pharmaceutical Industry* , 2005, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[23]  Bernadette A. Minton,et al.  The Impact of Cash Flow Volatility on Discretionary Investment and the Costs of Debt and Equity Financing , 1999 .

[24]  H. Grabowski,et al.  The Distribution of Sales Revenues from Pharmaceutical Innovation , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.