Monte Carlo method for the analysis of laser safety for a high-powered lidar system under different atmospheric conditions

A major concern of high-powered atmospheric lidar systems is eye safety. Atmospheric lidars are often run unattended in adverse weather conditions where scattering redirects laser energy from the main beam. These naturally varying “soft targets” (such as fog and precipitation) are not accounted for in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards but, through multiple scattering events, can potentially create adverse viewing conditions. This paper introduces a Monte Carlo method that uses scattering phase functions for fog and snow and applies multiple scattering analysis to map the energy density within a scattering volume around the primary beam. Careful attention is given to accurately describing the forward scattering portion of the phase function as it scatters a significant amount of the beam energy. This method is compared to ANSI standard hazard zone calculations to determine what effect scattering has on the size of the hazard zone. For direct beam viewing, hazard zone size estimates are within about 3% of the ANSI defined Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD) for clear air but are approximately 56% smaller than the NOHD as optical density increases for scattering in fog and approximately 33% smaller for scattering in blowing snow. For indirect beam exposure, clear air gives the worst approximation to the ANSI defined Nominal Hazard Zone (NHZ), in error by approximately 93%; fog approaches the ANSI results, within 30% error, whereas blowing snow shows 70% error. Finally, scattering enhancement mechanisms are considered which relate to the definition of the scattering layer of interest and increase scattered energy density observed by approximately 4%. In all cases, the ANSI calculated NOHD and NHZ are larger than the hazard zones that include scattering but the size of the zones is inextricably linked to the type of scattering ignored in the standard NOHD and NHZ calculations.

[1]  Joel N. Bixler,et al.  Modeling focusing Gaussian beams in a turbid medium with Monte Carlo simulations. , 2015, Optics express.

[2]  L. Poole,et al.  Semianalytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for oceanographic lidar systems. , 1981, Applied optics.

[3]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave. , 1984, Applied optics.

[4]  G. Plass,et al.  Monte carlo calculations of light scattering from clouds. , 1968, Applied optics.

[5]  Reflection of light pulses from clouds. , 1971, Applied optics.

[6]  Matthew Hayman,et al.  Field-deployable diode-laser-based differential absorption lidar (DIAL) for profiling water vapor , 2014 .

[7]  Michael Gerding,et al.  Lidars With Narrow FOV for Daylight Measurements , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  Rotational Raman Lidar measurements of atmospheric temperature in the UV , 2004 .

[9]  W. Cornette,et al.  Physically reasonable analytic expression for the single-scattering phase function. , 1992, Applied optics.

[10]  L Wang,et al.  MCML--Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[11]  Vincent Noel,et al.  A global view of horizontally oriented crystals in ice clouds from Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) , 2010 .

[12]  Ina Mattis,et al.  RAMSES: German Meteorological Service autonomous Raman lidar for water vapor, temperature, aerosol, and cloud measurements. , 2012, Applied optics.

[13]  D T Delpy,et al.  The use of the Henyey–Greenstein phase function in Monte Carlo simulations in biomedical optics , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  A satellite-based climatology of fog and low-level stratus in Germany and adjacent areas , 2002 .

[15]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Spectrally Consistent Scattering, Absorption, and Polarization Properties of Atmospheric Ice Crystals at Wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 um , 2013 .

[16]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Monte Carlo Analysis of Multiply Scattered Lidar Returns. , 1976 .

[17]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols. , 1997, Applied optics.

[18]  Alain Hauchecorne,et al.  The ALOMAR Rayleigh/Mie/Raman lidar: objectives, configuration, and performance , 2000 .

[19]  Russell E. Warren,et al.  Rayleigh lidar system for middle atmosphere research in the arctic , 1997 .

[20]  L. Poole,et al.  Computed laser backscattering from turbid liquids: comparison with laboratory results. , 1982, Applied optics.

[21]  D. Toublanc,et al.  Henyey-Greenstein and Mie phase functions in Monte Carlo radiative transfer computations. , 1996, Applied optics.

[22]  David D. Turner,et al.  High and Dry: New Observations of Tropospheric and Cloud Properties above the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2013 .

[23]  Matthew Hayman,et al.  Polarization Lidar at Summit, Greenland, for the Detection of Cloud Phase and Particle Orientation , 2013 .

[24]  M. Shupe,et al.  Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds , 2012 .

[25]  Albert Mendoza,et al.  Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique. , 2007, Optics express.

[26]  Joel N. Bixler,et al.  Methods for variance reduction in Monte Carlo simulations , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[27]  S. A. Prahl,et al.  A Monte Carlo model of light propagation in tissue , 1989, Other Conferences.