Changing landscape in biotechnology patenting

Trade regime of the world has brought into focus the ability to generate and secure IPR. The transformation has been rapid and recent decades have seen an increase in intellectual property protection worldwide. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) has, since it began in 1978, seen continuous growth with a record 156,100 application filed in 2007, representing a 4.7% growth over the previous year. Most academic patents applied for are in biotechnology or related fields. The paper identifies the effect of the changing landscape in biotechnology patents. Changes in specific areas like transgenic crops, nanotechnology, pharmaceuticals etc. are also discussed along with trends like the increase in patent applications by educational institutes across the globe. Certain problems pertaining to patenting of biotechnological innovations that have arisen in recent times are also discussed.

[1]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[2]  Robert L. Paarlberg,et al.  The real threat to GM crops in poor countries: consumer and policy resistance to GM foods in rich countries , 2002 .

[3]  K S Kardam.  Patenting in the Emerging Fields of Technology , 2007 .

[4]  Christopher M. Holman.  Trends in Human Gene Patent Litigation , 2008, Science.

[5]  P. Chantawannakul,et al.  Intellectual property management and awareness at the university level in the biotechnology era: a Thai perspective , 2001 .

[6]  Timothy Caulfield,et al.  Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[8]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.

[9]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[10]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[11]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Armour,et al.  Poisons and politics - Indigenous rights and IP protection , 2007 .

[13]  Bernard Le Buanec,et al.  Protection of plant-related innovations: Evolution and current discussion , 2006 .

[14]  K. C. Garg,et al.  Patenting activity in the third world — a case study of biotechnology patents filed in India , 1993 .

[15]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[16]  L. Andrews,et al.  Patents on Human Genes: An Analysis of Scope and Claims , 2005, Science.

[18]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .

[19]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[20]  Aude Lecrubier.  Patents and public health , 2002 .

[21]  Derek Wood.  European patents for biotechnological inventions - past, present and future , 2001 .

[22]  L. Akers.  The future of patent information--a user with a view , 2003 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[24]  M. Scheu,et al.  Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach , 2006 .

[25]  Luca Falciola,et al.  Searching biotechnology information: A case study , 2009 .

[26]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[27]  S. Kowalski.  Rational Risk/Benefit Analysis of Genetically Modified Crops , 2007 .

[28]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[29]  B. Sampat.  Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole , 2006 .

[30]  Curt Edfjäll.  The future of European patent information , 2008 .

[31]  T. Ramasami,et al.  Study of landscape of global leather patents and analysis of technology linkages to trade , 2006 .

[32]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[34]  N. Ringertz,et al.  The Nobel prize : the first 100 years , 2001 .

[35]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[36]  A. Antunes,et al.  Pharmaceutical patents on plant derived materials in Brazil: Policy, law and statistics , 2006 .

[37]  Human Embryonic Stem Cell Patents: A European Perspective , 2007 .