Neural Insights into the Relation between Language and Communication

The human capacity to communicate has been hypothesized to be causally dependent upon language. Intuitively this seems plausible since most communication relies on language. Moreover, intention recognition abilities (as a necessary prerequisite for communication) and language development seem to co-develop. Here we review evidence from neuroimaging as well as from neuropsychology to evaluate the relationship between communicative and linguistic abilities. Our review indicates that communicative abilities are best considered as neurally distinct from language abilities. This conclusion is based upon evidence showing that humans rely on different cortical systems when designing a communicative message for someone else as compared to when performing core linguistic tasks, as well as upon observations of individuals with severe language loss after extensive lesions to the language system, who are still able to perform tasks involving intention understanding.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners , 2008, Cognition.

[2]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication , 2012 .

[3]  H. Brownell,et al.  Acquired `theory of mind' impairments following stroke , 1999, Cognition.

[4]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? , 2005, Science.

[5]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Playing Charades in the fMRI: Are Mirror and/or Mentalizing Areas Involved in Gestural Communication? , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[8]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Cortical mechanism of communicative speech production , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  Ann Senghas,et al.  Language Promotes False-Belief Understanding , 2009, Psychological science.

[10]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  On the human ‘interactional engine’ , 2006 .

[11]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Understanding Intentions in Social Interaction: The Role of the Anterior Paracingulate Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[14]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Memory Effects of Speech and Gesture Binding: Cortical and Hippocampal Activation in Relation to Subsequent Memory Performance , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Congruent Embodied Representations for Visually Presented Actions and Linguistic Phrases Describing Actions , 2006, Current Biology.

[16]  熊 学亮 认知语用学概论 = Cognitive pragmatics , 1999 .

[17]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  J. D. Ruiter,et al.  On the origin of intentions , 2007 .

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[20]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review , 2007, Brain and Language.

[22]  M. Tomasello Origins of human communication , 2008 .

[23]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Say it with flowers! An fMRI study of object mediated communication , 2009, Brain and Language.

[24]  P. Carruthers The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A cerebral dissociation between linguistic and communicative abilities in humans , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding in infants , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[30]  H. Walter,et al.  The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Ian A. Apperly,et al.  Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[32]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[34]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[35]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  J. de Villiers,et al.  Thinking While Talking , 2007, Psychological science.

[37]  Ulf Liszkowski Infant Pointing at 12 Months: Communicative Goals, Motives, and Social-Cognitive Abilities , 2006 .

[38]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Recipient design in tacit communication , 2009, Cognition.

[39]  Maurizio Tirassa,et al.  Communicative Competence and the Architecture of the Mind/Brain , 1999, Brain and Language.

[40]  C. Goodwin Co-constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man. , 1995 .

[41]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient , 2000, Current Biology.

[42]  M. Tomasello,et al.  One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. , 2005, Developmental science.

[43]  P. Bloom,et al.  Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind , 2000, Cognition.

[44]  Andreas Hennenlotter,et al.  Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures , 2008, NeuroImage.

[45]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Neural Dissociations between Action Verb Understanding and Motor Imagery , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Category specificity in an agrammatic patient: The relative impairment of verb retrieval and comprehension , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  J. Astington,et al.  Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. , 2007, Child development.

[48]  S. Levinson,et al.  Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[49]  Tiziana Aureli,et al.  Children's Understanding of Communicative Intentions in the Middle of the Second Year of Life. , 2009 .

[50]  C. Frith,et al.  “Hey John”: Signals Conveying Communicative Intention toward the Self Activate Brain Regions Associated with “Mentalizing,” Regardless of Modality , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers , 2009, NeuroImage.

[52]  B. Bara,et al.  Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic Communication after Closed Head Injury , 2001, Brain and Language.

[53]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The extended language network: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[54]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[55]  M. Siegal,et al.  Neural systems involved in 'theory of mind' , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  U. Frith,et al.  The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on 'Theory of Mind' and cognition. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[58]  Gabriella Airenti,et al.  Is a naturalistic theory of communication possible? , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[59]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[60]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Seeing and Hearing Meaning: ERP and fMRI Evidence of Word versus Picture Integration into a Sentence Context , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Stephen C. Want,et al.  Severe Impairment in Grammar Does Not Preclude Theory of Mind , 2001, Neurocase.