Feedback control of occupant motion during a crash

Abstract Passive in-vehicle safety systems such as the air bag and the belt restrain the occupant during a crash. However, often their behavior is not optimal in terms of occupant injuries. This paper discusses an approach to design an ideal restraint system. The problem is formulated as a feedback tracking problem with the objective to force the controlled variables, i.e., the acceleration of the head and the chest of the occupant, to follow a priori defined reference signals by simultaneous manipulation of the belt and the air bag. The reference signals have to reflect minimal injuries to the head, the chest, and the neck. More or less realistic numerical models of a crash test are far too complex to be used in control design processes. Therefore, a strategy is presented to derive simple, linear MIMO models. These models approximate the local dynamic behavior of the complex model and are suitable for control design. Analysis of the interactions in these simple models makes it plausible that the control design problem can be split into two separate tracking problems. Next, stabilizing low order controllers are designed using these models, and implemented in the closed loop system with the realistic numerical model. Results are presented, suggesting that feedback control with low order controllers is extremely effective as a basis for ideal restraint systems. Reductions of the adopted injury measures of at least 40% in comparison with the uncontrolled restraint system are achieved.

[1]  Priya Prasad,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of the MVMA2D and the MADYM02D Occupant Simulation Models With MADYMO-Test Comparisons , 1985 .

[2]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  RESTRAINED HYBRID III DUMMY-BASED CRITERIA FOR THORACIC HARD-TISSUE INJURY PREDICTION , 2001 .

[3]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Research on gain scheduling , 2000, Autom..

[4]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Advanced Motion Control: An Industrial Perspective , 1998, Eur. J. Control.

[5]  Lori Summers,et al.  Development of an Occupant Position Sensor System to Improve Frontal Crash Protection , 2001 .

[6]  V. Rich.  Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[7]  Mohinder S. Grewal,et al.  Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[8]  K. H. Ho,et al.  An experimental air bag test system for the study of air bag deployment Loads , 2002 .

[9]  Margaret D. Galer Flyte,et al.  The Development of a ‘Smart Seat’ Occupant Size and Position Sensing System for the Enhancement of Occupant Protection , 1997 .

[10]  C. Desoer,et al.  Foundations of feedback theory for nonlinear dynamical systems , 1980 .

[11]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[12]  E. Bristol.  On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[13]  S. Boverie,et al.  Comparison of structured light and stereovision sensors for new airbag generations , 2003 .

[14]  Julian Hill,et al.  THE EFFECT OF OCCUPANT CHARACTERISTICS ON INJURY RISK AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACTIVE-ADAPTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[15]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Control design of a safety restraint system , 2002 .

[16]  Marko Bacic,et al.  Model predictive control , 2003 .

[17]  R. W. Pratt,et al.  A comparison of multivariable control and sequential loop closure control in a dynamic structural test system-design and implementation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[18]  J. Wismans,et al.  STATUS OF THE MADYMO 2D AIRBAG MODEL , 1988 .

[19]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[20]  C. K. Kroell,et al.  Impact Response of the Human Thorax , 1973 .

[21]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  The Programmed Restraint System - A Lesson from Accidentology , 1997 .

[22]  R. F. Neathery,et al.  Mechanical simulation of human thorax under impact , 1973 .

[23]  Jose A. Romagnoli,et al.  On-line optimal trajectory control for a fermentation process using multi-linear models , 2001 .

[24]  Morris Driels,et al.  Linear Control Systems Engineering , 1995 .

[25]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Identification and control for future restraint systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[26]  B. Schutter,et al.  Minimal state-space realization in linear system theory: an overview , 2000 .

[27]  Henning Schmidt,et al.  Model based design of decentralized control configurations , 2002 .

[28]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  NEW AIS1 LONG-TERM NECK INJURY CRITERIA CANDIDATES BASED ON REAL FRONTAL CRASH ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[29]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  On the synergism of the driver air bag and the 3-point belt in frontal collisions , 1995 .

[30]  G. van Ditzhuijzen,et al.  Identification and model predictive control of a slab reheating furnace , 2002, Proceedings of the International Conference on Control Applications.

[31]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REBOUND PHASE IN LOW SPEED REAR END IMPACTS , 2000 .

[32]  H G Johannessen,et al.  Why "Intelligent" Automotive Occupant Restraint Systems? , 1995 .

[33]  M. M. Kamal,et al.  Analysis and Simulation of Vehicle to Barrier Impact , 1970 .

[34]  K Ziegahn,et al.  Effectiveness of real time control for active restraint systems in frontal crashes , 2004 .

[35]  Raimondo Sferco,et al.  An evaluation of existing and proposed injury criteria with various dummies to determine their ability to predict the levels of soft tissue neck injury seen in real world accidents , 2003 .

[36]  RJ Rogier Hesseling,et al.  Active restraint systems : feedback control of occupant motion , 2004 .

[37]  S. J. Hu,et al.  Data-based approach in modeling automobile crash , 1995 .