Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning

How and why individuals adopt innovations has motivated a great deal of research. This article examines individuals’ computing adoption processes through the lenses of three adoption theories: Rogers’s innovation diffusion theory, the Concerns-Based Adoption Model, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the United Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Incorporating all three models, this article suggests technology adoption is a complex, inherently social, developmental process; individuals construct unique yet malleable perceptions of technology that influence their adoption decisions. Thus, successfully facilitating technology adoption must address cognitive, emotional, and contextual concerns. This article also focuses specific attention on adoption theory outside of a formal organization and the implications of adoption theory on informal environments.

[1]  Frances F. Fuller.  Concerns of Teachers: A Developmental Conceptualization1 , 1969 .

[2]  Descriptors Change Strategies.  paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education , 1977 .

[3]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Teacher Concerns as a Basis for Facilitating and Personalizing Staff Development , 1978, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[5]  G. Hall.  The Concerns-Based Approach to Facilitating Change. , 1979 .

[6]  Larry Cuban.  How did teachers teach, 1890–1980 , 1983 .

[7]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[8]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[9]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  Taking Charge of Change , 1987 .

[10]  I Kraus,et al.  Taking charge of change , 2018, Managing Organisational Success in the Arts.

[11]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  Modifying Classroom Teachers' Acceptance of the Consulting Teacher Model , 1990 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[15]  D. Bailey,et al.  Qualities of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and Implications for Educational Innovations , 1992 .

[16]  Valerie A. Clarke,et al.  Diversity as a Determinant of Attitudes: A Possible Explanation of the Apparent Advantage of Single-Sex Settings , 1995 .

[17]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  The social psychology of decision making. , 1996 .

[18]  An Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Concerns Based Adoption Model for Teacher Concerns in Education Reform. , 1996 .

[19]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[20]  S. Anderson,et al.  Understanding Teacher Change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model , 1997 .

[21]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  AgarwalRitu,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998 .

[23]  David Jaffee,et al.  Institutionalized Resistance To Asynchronous Learning Networks , 1998 .

[24]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[25]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[26]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[27]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Technological Diffusion within Educational Institutions: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model , 1999 .

[28]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[29]  Ralph Cafolla,et al.  The selection of an instructional management system , 1999 .

[30]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  G. Knezek,et al.  Measures of Teacher Stages of Technology Integration and Their Correlates with Student Achievement. , 2001 .

[33]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Reaping the benefits of innovative IT: the long and winding road , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[34]  The Bronx School District's Quest to Harness the Educational Potential of Digital Technology , 2001 .

[35]  A. Bandura.  Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[36]  J. Schulz.  Reaping the Benefits , 2002 .

[37]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action , 2002 .

[38]  Stacy L. Wood,et al.  Psychological Indicators of Innovation Adoption: Cross-Classification Based on Need for Cognition and Need for Change , 2002 .

[39]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[40]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  A. Barron,et al.  Large-Scale Research Study on Technology in K–12 Schools , 2003 .

[42]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[43]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Cycles of Innovation in the Adoption of Information Technology: A View for Language Teaching , 2004 .

[44]  Rita L. Dobbs.  Impact of Training on Faculty and Administrators in an Interactive Television Environment , 2004 .

[45]  D. Yip,et al.  How science teachers' concerns about school‐based assessment of practical work vary with time: the Hong Kong experience , 2004 .

[46]  Constantinos Christou,et al.  Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM , 2004 .

[47]  Amos Dreyfus,et al.  Types of “teachers in training”: the reactions of primary school science teachers when confronted with the task of implementing an innovation , 2004 .

[48]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  Computer experience: a poor predictor of computer attitudes , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Niki Davis,et al.  Preparing Teachers for the “Schools That Technology Built” , 2005 .

[50]  T. Kratochwill.  Theories of Change and Adoption of Innovations: The Evolving Evidence-Based Intervention and Practic , 2005 .

[51]  R. Barnes,et al.  Moving towards Technology Education: Factors That Facilitated Teachers' Implementation of a Technology Curriculum , 2005 .

[52]  G. Deffuant,et al.  An Individual‐Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Robert Andersson,et al.  Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[54]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[55]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform , 2005 .

[56]  Noelle Chesley.  Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction , 2005 .

[57]  Don VandeWalle,et al.  The Role of Goal Orientation on Negative Emotions and Goal Setting When Initial Performance Falls Short of One's Performance Goal , 2005 .

[58]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  End-User Acceptance of a Learning Management System in Two Hybrid Large-Sized Introductory Undergraduate Courses: A Case Study , 2005 .

[59]  Peter Sleegers,et al.  How does it feel? Teachers' emotions in a context of change , 2006 .

[60]  Lori Baker-Eveleth,et al.  Enabling Laptop Exams using Secure Software: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[61]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings , 2006 .

[62]  Student Information System Implementations: A Context for Campus Change. Results of an AACRAO Membership Survey. , 2006 .

[63]  Nelson Oly Ndubisi,et al.  Factors of Online Learning Adoption: A Comparative Juxtaposition of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Technology Acceptance Model. , 2006 .

[64]  C. Day,et al.  Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study , 2006 .

[65]  Raul A. Pinel,et al.  Theory of Reasoned Action , 2007 .

[66]  Ron Owston,et al.  Contextual factors that sustain innovative pedagogical practice using technology: an international study , 2007 .