A comparative study of design optimisation methodologies for side-impact crashworthiness, using injury-based versus energy-based criterion

The tension between occupant safety during a crash and lightweight designs continues to be an important driver of modern vehicle designs. While occupant safety may be defined and evaluated in various ways, maximising energy absorption of structural components during impact has been adopted for vehicle designs by many manufacturers. An alternative method to evaluate safety but often not directly used in the design of structural components is the use of a dummy model in the finite element (FE) simulation to estimate the forces and accelerations that would be experienced by a human in a crash environment. This paper investigates the similarities/differences between designing vehicular structural components experiencing side impacts based upon two different criteria: (1) the energy absorption of collapsed components in the absence of a dummy and (2) an injury metric–based approach with the responses of the dummy as the bases. Multi-objective optimisation methods are used with finite element analysis (FEA) in the lightweight design for side-impact crashworthiness, considering the two different criterion. The results show that the optimum designs based on the two criteria are significantly different and that the injury-based approach should be incorporated into vehicular lightweight design process when considering crashworthiness.

[1]  Zongmin Wu,et al.  Compactly supported positive definite radial functions , 1995 .

[2]  M Py,et al.  The thoracic member under side impact: an Experimental Approach , 2000 .

[3]  Cing-Dao Kan,et al.  Crashworthiness Evaluation Using Integrated Vehicle and Occupant Finite Element Models , 2001 .

[4]  King H. Yang,et al.  Development of a Finite Element Model of the Human Shoulder to Investigate the Mechanical Responses and Injuries in Side Impact , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  INTERNATIONAL HARMONIZATION OF SIDE IMPACT STANDARDS: VEHICLE DESIGN AND THORACIC INJURY CRITERIA TRENDS , 2003 .

[6]  F P Rivara,et al.  Vehicle mismatch: injury patterns and severity. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Santanu Majumder,et al.  Dynamic response of the pelvis under side impact load – a three-dimensional finite element approach , 2004 .

[8]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  Energy-Based Crashworthiness Optimization for Multiple Vehicle Impacts , 2004 .

[9]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  Numerical simulations of multiple vehicle crashes and multidisciplinary crashworthiness optimization , 2005 .

[10]  A. Tencer,et al.  Factors affecting pelvic and thoracic forces in near-side impact crashes: a study of US-NCAP, NASS, and CIREN data. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  HiPPO: An Object-Oriented Framework for General-Purpose Design Optimization , 2005, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[12]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization , 2005 .

[13]  P Hosseini-Tehrani,et al.  Effects of ribs on S-frame crashworthiness , 2006 .

[14]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  A generic optimizer interface for programming-free optimization systems , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[15]  A. Sances,et al.  Biomechanics of Side Impact Injuries: Evaluation of Seat Belt Restraint System, Occupant Kinematics and Injury Potential , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  H. Fang,et al.  Global response approximation with radial basis functions , 2006 .

[17]  Xianlong Jin,et al.  Improvement of energy-absorbing structures of a commercial vehicle for crashworthiness using finite element method , 2006 .

[18]  Patrick A. Forbes,et al.  Multi-scale human body model to predict side impact thoracic trauma , 2006 .

[19]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .