The comparative phylogeography of Neotropical mammals: patterns of intraspecific mitochondrial DNA variation among bats contrasted to nonvolant small mammals

The major aim of this study was to compare the phylogeographic patterns of codistributed bats and small nonvolant Neotropical mammals. Cytochrome b sequences (mitochondrial DNA) were obtained for a total of 275 bats representing 17 species. The tissue samples were collected in coastal Brazil, and were available from Mexico and the Guyana. The study concentrates on four species (Artibeus lituratus, Carollia perspicillata, Sturnira lilium and Glossophaga soricina) which were well represented. The other 13 species were sequenced to test the generality of the patterns observed. In general, sequence divergence values within species were low, with most bat species presenting less than 4% average sequence divergence, and usually between 1 and 2.5%. Clades of highly similar haplotypes enjoyed broad distribution on a continental scale. These clades were not usually geographically structured, and at a given locality the number of haplotypes was high (8–10). As distance increased, some moderately divergent clades were found, although the levels of divergence were low. This suggests a geographical effect that varied depending on species and scale. Small nonvolant mammals almost invariably have high levels of sequence divergence (> 10%) for cytochrome b over much shorter distances (< 1000 km). The grain of intraspecific variation found in small nonvolant mammals is much finer than in bats. Low levels of geographical structuring cannot be attributed to a slower evolutionary rate of bat DNA in relation to other mammalian taxa. The phylogeographic pattern of bats contrasts sharply with the pattern found for Neotropical rodents and marsupials.

[1]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The Refugial Debate , 2000, Science.

[2]  J. Avise,et al.  Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  G. Wilkinson,et al.  Migration and evolution of lesser long‐nosed bats Leptonycteris curasoae, inferred from mitochondrial DNA , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[4]  Iksoo Kim,et al.  MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF THE FRUIT BAT, ARTIBEUS JAMAICENSIS : ORIGIN OF AN UNUSUAL ISLAND POPULATION , 1996 .

[5]  J. Malcolm,et al.  Hierarchical genetic structure and gene flow in three sympatric species of Amazonian rodents. , 1996 .

[6]  M. Lara,et al.  The simultaneous diversification of South American echimyid rodents (Hystricognathi) based on complete cytochrome b sequences. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[7]  C. Tidemann,et al.  Genetic variation in the little red flying-fox Pteropus scapulatus (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) : Implications for management , 1996 .

[8]  D. King,et al.  Molecular divergence and phylogeny: rates and patterns of cytochrome b evolution in cranes. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  J Mallet,et al.  A species definition for the modern synthesis. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  D. Kitchener,et al.  A GENETIC PERSPECTIVE OF MAMMALIAN VARIATION AND EVOLUTION IN THE INDONESIAN ARCHIPELAGO: BIOGEOGRAPHIC CORRELATES IN THE FRUIT BAT GENUS CYNOPTERUS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Phylogeny of whales: dependence of the inference on species sampling. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  C. Moritz,et al.  xtreme population structuring in the threatened ghost bat, Macroderma gigas: evidence from mitochondrial DNA , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Meyer,et al.  Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  J. Malcolm,et al.  GENE GENEALOGY AND DIFFERENTIATION AMONG ARBOREAL SPINY RATS (RODENTIA: ECHIMYIDAE) OF THE AMAZON BASIN: A TEST OF THE RIVERINE BARRIER HYPOTHESIS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  P. D. Sudman,et al.  Familial Affinity of Tomopeas ravus (Chiroptera) Based on Protein Electrophoretic and Cytochrome b Sequence Data , 1994 .

[16]  R. Baker,et al.  Systematic Relationships Within Chiroderma (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) Based on Cytochrome b Sequence Variation , 1994 .

[17]  W. Ludwig,et al.  The Importance of Using Outgroup Reference Organisms in Phylogenetic Studies: the Atopobium Case , 1994 .

[18]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  Accuracies of the simple methods for estimating the bootstrap probability of a maximum-likelihood tree , 1994 .

[19]  J. Patton,et al.  The diversification of South American murid rodents: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequence data for the akodontine tribe , 1993 .

[20]  M. N. D. Da Silva,et al.  Amazonian phylogeography: mtDNA sequence variation in arboreal echimyid rodents (Caviomorpha). , 1993, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[21]  H Philippe,et al.  Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. , 1993, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[22]  R. Baker,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics of Stenodermatini bat genera: congruence of data from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  R. Baker,et al.  Molecular Phylogenetics of the New World Bat Genus Phyllostomus Based on Cytochrome b DNA Sequence Variation , 1993 .

[24]  A. Peterson,et al.  Genetic differentiation in Philippine bats of the genera Cynopterus and Haplonycteris , 1993 .

[25]  J. Patton,et al.  mtDNA PHYLOGENY OF ANDEAN MICE: A TEST OF DIVERSIFICATION ACROSS ECOLOGICAL GRADIENTS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  J. Avise Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna : a case history with lessons for conservation biology , 1992 .

[27]  J. Patton,et al.  Variation in mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence in natural populations of South American akodontine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae). , 1991, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  A. Meyer,et al.  Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILS , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[30]  E. Goldin,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in three Antillean island populations of the fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  J. Neigel,et al.  Intraspecific Phylogeography: The Mitochondrial DNA Bridge Between Population Genetics and Systematics , 1987 .

[32]  K. Mullis,et al.  Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. , 1985, Science.

[33]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  R. Roeder,et al.  Factors involved in specific transcription by human RNA polymerase II: analysis by a rapid and quantitative in vitro assay. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Koike Katsuro,et al.  Nucleotide sequence and evolution of the rat mitochondrial cytochrome b gene containing the ochre termination codon , 1982 .

[36]  D. A. Clayton,et al.  Sequence and gene organization of mouse mitochondrial DNA , 1981, Cell.

[37]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Wilson,et al.  Generation time and genomic evolution in primates. , 1973, Science.

[39]  J. Haffer Speciation in amazonian forest birds. , 1969, Science.