Assessment of Regeneration Projects in Urban Areas of Environmental Interest: A Stated Choice Approach to Estimate Use and Quasi-Option Values

We adopt an attribute-based stated choice approach to evaluate public preferences over planning alternatives for an urban site of environmental interest. Since such projects involve some uncertainty and irreversibility, special attention is devoted to the estimation of quasi-option values associated with project development. Two distinct measures for the quasi-option value are estimated, and both coefficients indicate that the public place significant value on the reduction of the possibility of adverse irreversible effects: a more prudent development strategy is valued at about four times greater than a procedure that provides a greater chance of an undesired outcome. Furthermore, the study involves elicitation of intertemporal preferences over projects with different time spans, and estimation of the implicit discount rates: the values obtained seem high if compared with standard discount rates applied to public projects, but not far from interest rates on consumption found in the market.

[1]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths , 2005 .

[2]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Mixed Logit Models: Some New Evidence , 2005 .

[3]  Shanefrederick,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review , 2022 .

[4]  K. Arrow,et al.  Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility , 1974 .

[5]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[6]  Margarita Genius,et al.  The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Use Values of Recreational Sites , 2001 .

[7]  Charles M. Harvey,et al.  Value functions for infinite-period planning , 1986 .

[8]  R. Lind,et al.  Reassessing the government's discount rate policy in light of new theory and data in a world economy with a high degree of capital mobility , 1990 .

[9]  T. Requate,et al.  The Dixit-Pindyck and the Arrow-Fisher-Hanemann-Henry Option Values are Not Equivalent , 2003 .

[10]  Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method? , 2005 .

[11]  Erik Meijer,et al.  Measuring Welfare Effects in Models with Random Coefficients , 2000 .

[12]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Estimating the Benefits of Traffic Calming on Through Routes: A Choice Experiment Approach , 2003 .

[13]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[14]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Quasi-option value and climate policy choices , 1998 .

[15]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review , 2002 .

[16]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception , 2005 .

[17]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[18]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Willingness-To-Pay, Compensating Variation, and the Cost of Commitment , 2004 .

[19]  John W. Polak,et al.  Assessing User Benefits with Discrete Choice Models: Implications of Specification Errors Under Random Taste Heterogeneity , 2005 .

[20]  C. Henry.  Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: The "Irreversibility Effect." , 1974 .

[21]  K. Willis.  Assessing public preferences: The use of stated-preference experiments to assess the impact of varying planning conditions , 2006 .

[22]  W. Hanemann,et al.  Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled☆ , 1987 .

[23]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  A General and Operational Representation of Generalised Extreme Value Models , 2006 .

[24]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[25]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[26]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments , 2008 .

[27]  A. Alberini,et al.  The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: evidence from surveys of developers. , 2005 .

[28]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[29]  Elisabetta Strazzera,et al.  A Choice Modelling Approach for Assessment of Use and Quasi-Option Values in Urban Planning for Areas of Environmental Interest , 2008 .

[30]  J. Weyant,et al.  Discounting and Intergenerational Equity , 1999 .

[31]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[32]  J. Innes,et al.  Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century , 2004 .

[33]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[34]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[35]  N. Hanley.  Cost — Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policymaking , 2001 .

[36]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  Empirical Identification in the Mixed Logit Model: Analysing the Effect of Data Richness , 2008 .

[37]  K. Arrow,et al.  Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? , 1996, Science.

[38]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Declining Discount Rates: The Long and the Short of it , 2005 .

[39]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[40]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[41]  David Pearce,et al.  Discounting the future: the long and the short of it , 2005 .

[42]  Jay R. Corrigan,et al.  Willingness to Pay and the Cost of Commitment: An Empirical Specification and Test , 2008 .

[43]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[44]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of WTP for Use Values of Recreational Sites , 2002 .

[45]  Michel Bierlaire.  A general formulation of the cross-nested logit model , 2001 .

[46]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[47]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements , 2009 .

[48]  Helena Catt,et al.  Democracy in practice , 1999 .

[49]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study , 2007 .

[50]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[51]  D. McFadden.  Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[52]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[53]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain , 2002 .

[54]  D. O’Reilly,et al.  Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements , 2007 .

[55]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[56]  Mbolatiana Rambonilaza,et al.  Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? , 2007 .

[57]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Shopping Centre Size and Store Variety on Consumer Choice Behaviour , 1997 .

[58]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting , 1995 .

[59]  Recursive nested extreme value model , 2001 .

[60]  C. Henry,et al.  Option Values in the Economics of Irreplaceable Assets , 1974 .

[61]  Dietrich Earnhart,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods to Value Environmental Amenities at Residential Locations , 2001, Land Economics.

[62]  G. Garrod,et al.  Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys , 2003 .

[63]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting. , 1980 .

[64]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Information and the concept of option value , 1983 .

[65]  Anna Vári,et al.  Public participation in environmental decisions , 2000 .

[66]  H. Williams.  On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[67]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  The estimation of generalized extreme value models from choice-based samples , 2008 .

[68]  K. Arrow,et al.  Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? , 1996, Science.

[69]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  Examining Predictive Accuracy Among Discounting Models , 2002 .

[70]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[71]  G. Garrod,et al.  Estimating Benefits for Effective Enforcement of Speed Reduction from Dichotomous-Choice CV , 2001 .