Performance analysis of wind fence models when used for truck protection under crosswind through numerical modeling

Abstract This paper is focused on truck aerodynamic analysis under crosswind conditions by means of numerical modeling. The truck was located on the crest of an embankment during the study. In order to analyze the performance of three wind fence models, the truck's aerodynamic coefficients were obtained and compared in two different situations either with or without the wind fences installed. In addition, the effect of both height and porosity of wind fence models on the aerodynamic coefficients acting on truck with respect to separation distance between the truck and the wind fence, was analyzed. A finite volume (or computational fluid dynamic) code was used to carry out the numerical modeling. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations along with the k − ω SST turbulence model were used to predict the behavior of turbulent flow. With respect to the results, the influence of the distance on the rollover coefficient is soft for all height values studied except for the lowest value (1 m of fence height), where the maximum value of rollover coefficient was obtained for the truck position closer to the fence. Regarding fence porosity, its effect on rollover coefficient is stronger for truck positions on road closer to the wind fence model.

[1]  Jack E. Cermak,et al.  Advances in physical modeling for wind engineering , 1987 .

[2]  E. Sabbioni,et al.  Wind tunnel tests on heavy road vehicles: Cross wind induced loads—Part 2 , 2011 .

[3]  Federico Cheli,et al.  Development of Wind Allarm Systems for Road and Rail Vehicles: Presentation of the WEATHER Project , 2006 .

[4]  Angel Sanz-Andrés,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks , 2007 .

[5]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Fluid Dynamics , 2005 .

[6]  Simon Bell,et al.  Simulating the sheltering effects of windbreaks in urban outdoor open space , 2007 .

[7]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor Engineering , 2001 .

[8]  Cheol Woo Park,et al.  The effects of a bottom gap and non-uniform porosity in a wind fence on the surface pressure of a triangular prism located behind the fence , 2001 .

[9]  X.-J. Lin,et al.  Simulation of the effect of windbreaks on odour dispersion , 2007 .

[10]  G. Tomasini,et al.  Crosswind action on rail vehicles: wind tunnel experimental analyses , 2008 .

[11]  Hiroyuki Torita,et al.  Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction , 2007 .

[12]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Cross-wind effects on a vehicle crossing the wake of a bridge pylon , 2011 .

[13]  Jiyuan Tu,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Approach , 2007 .

[14]  A. Tuzet,et al.  Measured winds about a thick hedge , 2007 .

[15]  A. Alonso-Estébanez,et al.  Numerical simulation of bus aerodynamics on several classes of bridge decks , 2017 .

[16]  Zhibao Dong,et al.  A wind tunnel simulation of the mean velocity fields behind upright porous fences , 2007 .

[17]  P. J. García Nieto,et al.  Numerical simulation of the performance of a snow fence with airfoil snow plates by FVM , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[18]  Martin Schober,et al.  Wind tunnel investigation of an ICE 3 endcar on three standard ground scenarios , 2010 .

[19]  F. Menter.  Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[20]  Se-Woon Hong,et al.  Numerical simulation of an array of fences in Saemangeum reclaimed land , 2009 .

[21]  Julian F. Scott,et al.  An Introduction to Turbulent Flow , 2000 .

[22]  R. D. Tabler,et al.  Effects of Snow Fences on Crashes and Road Closures: A 34-Year Study on Wyoming Interstate-80 , 2006 .

[23]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[25]  F. Dorigatti,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements of crosswind loads on high sided vehicles over long span bridges , 2012 .

[26]  Ruey-Jen Yang,et al.  An investigation into the sheltering performance of porous windbreaks under various wind directions , 2010 .

[27]  Stefan Koenig,et al.  A short-term strong wind prediction model for railway application: design and verification , 2002 .

[28]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Wind tunnel investigations of aerodynamic coefficients of road vehicles on bridge deck , 2012 .

[29]  G. Tomasini,et al.  Wind tunnel tests on heavy road vehicles: Cross wind induced loads--Part 1 , 2011 .

[30]  Hiroaki Ishida,et al.  New train regulation method based on wind direction and velocity of natural wind against strong winds , 2002 .

[31]  F. Menter.  ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS , 1993 .

[32]  Hong-bing Xiong,et al.  Aerodynamic modeling and stability analysis of a high-speed train under strong rain and crosswind conditions , 2011 .

[33]  Theodore Stathopoulos,et al.  Numerical evaluation of wind flow over complex terrain : review , 2004 .

[34]  J. Rodríguez-Hernández,et al.  Classification and comparison of snow fences for the protection of transport infrastructures , 2011 .

[35]  Bengt Andersson,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers , 2011 .

[36]  R. D. Tabler.  Three-Dimensional Roughness Elements for Snow Retention , 2006 .

[37]  H. B. Kim,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF TURBULENT SHEAR FLOW AROUND A TWO-DIMENSIONAL POROUS FENCE HAVING A BOTTOM GAP , 2002 .

[38]  Weiwei Guo,et al.  Wind tunnel test on aerodynamic effect of wind barriers on train-bridge system , 2015 .