Generalised improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia

Background: Reproduction conduction aphasia is a disorder of phonological production characterised by phonological errors occurring particularly with longer words in all tasks requiring spoken output. There have been few previous studies of therapy for subjects with this disorder. Aims: The study investigates the effects of a treatment procedure involving the detection and correction of the errors in speech production with a single subject, MB. We also seek to establish the nature of MB's underlying deficit, and show how it changes as a result of treatment. Methods & Procedures: Treatment effects were investigated in a single case study using multiple baselines over tasks, materials, and time. An in-depth cognitive neuropsychological case study was used to investigate the nature of MB's speech production deficit. Outcomes & Results: MB had impaired naming, repetition, and oral reading particularly with longer words, but good word comprehension. Her errors were primarily phonological, with many repeated attempts (“conduite d'approche”). Production of non-words was less accurate than real words. The treatment improved production in all modalities and across a variety of tasks (including non-word reading). Further analysis of assessment results suggested that MB's impairment was at the level of phonological encoding and that therapy had improved phoneme production across all word positions. Conclusions: Treatment was successful and generalised across items and to connected speech. MB's deficit could be characterised as a difficulty in the process of phoneme retrieval, and this improved as a result of the treatment.

[1]  W. Huber,et al.  “Prepairs” and repairs: Different monitoring functions in aphasic language production , 1987, Brain and Language.

[2]  Lyndsey Nickels The autocue? self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming , 1992 .

[3]  I. T. Draper THE ASSESSMENT OF APHASIA AND RELATED DISORDERS , 1973 .

[4]  Eric Keller,et al.  Sequences of phonemic approximations in aphasia , 1980, Brain and Language.

[5]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Treatment of Anomia Resulting from Output Lexical Damage: Analysis of Two Cases , 1996, Brain and Language.

[6]  H. Gardner,et al.  The repetition defect in conduction aphasia: Mnestic or linguistic? , 1974 .

[7]  T Shallice,et al.  THE SELECTIVE IMPAIRMENT OF THE PHONOLOGICAL OUTPUT BUFFER , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[9]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Spoken Word Production and Its Breakdown In Aphasia , 1997 .

[10]  D. Howard Lexical Anomia: Or the Case of the Missing Lexical Entries , 1995 .

[11]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  D. Howard,et al.  Phonological Errors in Aphasic Naming: Comprehension, Monitoring and Lexicality , 1995, Cortex.

[13]  K. Heilman,et al.  Lack of Error Awareness in an Aphasic Patient with Relatively Preserved Auditory Comprehension , 1994, Brain and Language.

[14]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[15]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  S. Shattuck-Hufnagel The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering , 1992, Cognition.

[17]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Picture-naming in aphasia , 1985, Brain and Language.

[18]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Disorders of phonological encoding , 1992, Cognition.

[19]  Gerhard Blanken,et al.  LEXICALISATION IN SPEECH PRODUCTION: EVIDENCE FROM FORM RELATED WORD SUBSTITUTIONS IN APHASIA. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  J. Morton,et al.  Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. A comparison of two therapy methods. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding , 1995 .

[22]  K. H. Pribram,et al.  Language and Language Disturbances , 1949, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[23]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data , 1989, Brain and Language.

[24]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  WEAVER++ and other computational models of lemma retrieval and word-form encoding , 2000 .

[25]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[26]  Nadine Martin,et al.  Specifying the nature of the production impairment in a conductionxs aphasic: A case study , 1987 .

[27]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The role of the (output) phonological buffer in reading, writing, and repetition , 1986 .

[28]  David Howard,et al.  The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia , 1985 .

[29]  D. Caplan,et al.  A case study of reproduction conduction aphasia I: Word production , 1986 .

[30]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[31]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Aspects of language production , 2000 .

[32]  A. Ellis,et al.  A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Implications for psychological models of word retrieval. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[34]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[35]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[36]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Behavioral analysis of the repetition deficit in conduction aphasia , 1972, Neurology.

[37]  David Howard,et al.  The effects of lexical stress in aphasic word production , 2002 .

[38]  S. Kohn,et al.  The remediation of conduction aphasia via sentence repetition: a case study. , 1990, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[39]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Auditory-verbal short-term memory impairment and conduction aphasia , 1977, Brain and Language.

[40]  Jean-Luc Nespoulous,et al.  Intrinsic organization of sequences of phonemic approximations: A preliminary study , 1989 .

[41]  R. Mccarthy,et al.  Experimental investigations of an impairment in phonological encoding , 1996 .

[42]  G. Dell,et al.  Origins of Paraphasias in Deep Dysphasia: Testing the Consequences of a Decay Impairment to an Interactive Spreading Activation Model of Lexical Retrieval , 1994, Brain and Language.

[43]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[44]  Cristina Romani,et al.  Are there distinct input and output buffers? Evidence from an aphasic patient with an impaired output buffer , 1992 .

[45]  Wendy Best,et al.  When Racquets Are Baskets But Baskets Are Biscuits, Where Do the Words Come From ? A Single Case Study of Formal Paraphasic Errors in Aphasia , 1996 .

[46]  D. Howard Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: the case of word retrieval , 2000 .

[47]  R. Angelergues,et al.  Étude neurolinguistique de l'aphasie de conduction , 1964 .