Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: application to LNH-87 protocol. The GELA. (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte).

BACKGROUND To evaluate the effects of chemotherapy dose intensity (DI) on outcome in patients with aggressive lymphoma, the received relative DI (received RDI) is usually calculated using Hryniuk's model. We applied this model to a selected patient subgroup included in the LNH87 protocol (LNH87-2 protocol), who had been treated with the ACVB induction regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged < 55 who had at least one of the following prognostic factors: performance status (PS) > or = 2, number of extranodal sites > or = 2, tumor burden > or = 10 cm, bone marrow or central nervous system involvement, and Burkitt's or lymphoblastic histologic subtype, were included in this study. Actual DI was calculated using the definition of DI as mg/m2/week previously described by Hryniuk. RESULTS Eighty-seven of the 311 patients included in the study (28%) presented a RDI below 70% of the theoretical DI. We demonstrated a decreased response rate (65% vs. 79%, p = 0.01) and shorter overall 2-year survival (61% vs. 72%, p = 0.02) in patients receiving a DI < 70%. This difference was still significant when the multiparametric analysis was used (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Results obtained when this model was applied to aggressive lymphoma patients included in the LNH-87 protocol led to the demonstration of a strong relationship between received RDI and survival.

[1]  R. Fisher,et al.  A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  J. Radford,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent dose-limiting neutropenia in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized controlled trial. , 1992, Blood.

[3]  P. Duffey,et al.  The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Making cocktails versus making soup. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Armitage,et al.  Prognostic factors in aggressive malignant lymphomas: description and validation of a prognostic index that could identify patients requiring a more intensive therapy. The Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Agressifs. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  The role of dose intensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Connors,et al.  Prognostic variables in patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma treated with MACOP-B. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Fisher,et al.  Unfavorable histologies of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with ProMACE-CytaBOM: a groupwide Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  The calculation of received dose intensity. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R A Olshen,et al.  Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  B. Coiffier,et al.  LNH-84 regimen: a multicenter study of intensive chemotherapy in 737 patients with aggressive malignant lymphoma. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  S M Hubbard,et al.  The chemotherapy of lymphomas: looking back, moving forward--the Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation award lecture. , 1987, Cancer research.

[13]  A. Dembo Time-dose factors in chemotherapy: expanding the concept of dose-intensity. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Pinkus,et al.  Identification of major prognostic subgroups of patients with large-cell lymphoma treated with m-BACOD or M-BACOD. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  D. Weisenburger,et al.  Chemotherapy for diffuse large-cell lymphoma--rapidly responding patients have more durable remissions. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[18]  M Tubiana,et al.  Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification. , 1971, Cancer research.

[19]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .