NOISY WEAK-LENSING CONVERGENCE PEAK STATISTICS NEAR CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES AND BEYOND

Taking into account noise from intrinsic ellipticities of source galaxies, in this paper, we study the peak statistics in weak-lensing convergence maps around clusters of galaxies and beyond. We emphasize how the noise peak statistics is affected by the density distribution of nearby clusters, and also how cluster-peak signals are changed by the existence of noise. These are the important aspects to be thoroughly understood in weak-lensing analyses for individual clusters as well as in cosmological applications of weak-lensing cluster statistics. We adopt Gaussian smoothing with the smoothing scale θ G = 0.5 arcmin in our analyses. It is found that the noise peak distribution near a cluster of galaxies sensitively depends on the density profile of the cluster. For a cored isothermal cluster with the core radius R c , the inner region with R ≤ R c . appears noisy containing on average ~2.4 peaks with ν ≥ 5 for R c = 1.7 arcmin and the true peak height of the cluster ν = 5.6, where ν denotes the convergence signal-to-noise ratio. For a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) cluster of the same mass and the same central ν, the average number of peaks with ν ≥ 5 within R ≤ R c is ~1.6. Thus a high peak corresponding to the main cluster can be identified more cleanly in the NFW case. In the outer region with R c < R ≤ 5 R c . the number of high noise peaks is considerably enhanced in comparison with that of the pure noise case without the nearby cluster. For ν ≥ 4, depending on the treatment of the mass-sheet degeneracy in weak-lensing analyses, the enhancement factor f is in the range of ~5 to ~55 for both clusters as their outer density profiles are similar. The properties of the main-cluster-peak identified in convergence maps are also significantly affected by the presence of noise. Scatters as well as a systematic shift for the peak height are present. The height distribution is peaked at ν ~ 6.6, rather than at ν = 5.6, corresponding to a shift of Δν ~ 1, for the isothermal cluster. For the NFW cluster, Δν ~ 0.8. The existence of noise also causes a location offset for the weak-lensing identified main-cluster-peak with respect to the true center of the cluster. The offset distribution is very broad and extends to R ~ R c for the isothermal case. For the NFW cluster, it is relatively narrow and peaked at R ~ 0.2 R c . We also analyze NFW clusters of different concentrations. It is found that the more centrally concentrated the mass distribution of a cluster is, the less its weak-lensing signal is affected by noise. Incorporating these important effects and the mass function of NFW dark matter halos, we further present a model calculating the statistical abundances of total convergence peaks, true and false ones, over a large field beyond individual clusters. The results are in good agreement with those from numerical simulations. The model then allows us to probe cosmologies with the convergence peaks directly without the need of expensive follow-up observations to differentiate true and false peaks.

[1]  G. Soucail,et al.  Weak lensing survey of galaxy clusters in the CFHTLS Deep fields , 2006, astro-ph/0605591.

[2]  Simulations of weak gravitational lensing , 2003, astro-ph/0312133.

[3]  Detection of Dark Matter Concentrations in the Field of Cl 1604+4304 from Weak Lensing Analysis , 2000, astro-ph/0004373.

[4]  Morgan May,et al.  CONSTRAINING COSMOLOGY WITH HIGH-CONVERGENCE REGIONS IN WEAK LENSING SURVEYS , 2008, 0809.4052.

[5]  Ravi K. Sheth Giuseppe Tormen Large scale bias and the peak background split , 1999 .

[6]  Yannick Mellier,et al.  Cosmological constraints from the 100-deg2 weak-lensing survey , 2007 .

[7]  P. Astier,et al.  Dark-energy constraints and correlations with systematics from CFHTLS weak lensing, SNLS supernovae Ia and WMAP5 ⋆ , 2008, 0810.5129.

[8]  A. Szalay,et al.  The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields , 1986 .

[9]  C. Tao,et al.  Constraining cosmological parameters with observational data including weak lensing effects , 2008, 0812.1672.

[10]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations , 2005, astro-ph/0506112.

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  Dark matter maps reveal cosmic scaffolding , 2007, Nature.

[12]  M. White,et al.  Completeness in Weak-Lensing Searches for Clusters , 2001, astro-ph/0111490.

[13]  Z. Fan,et al.  Effects of the Complex Mass Distribution of Dark Matter Halos on Weak-Lensing Cluster Surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0508508.

[14]  Masahiro Takada,et al.  Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration , 2006 .

[15]  Noise properties of gravitational lens mass reconstruction , 1999, astro-ph/9909160.

[16]  S. White,et al.  The Structure of cold dark matter halos , 1995, astro-ph/9508025.

[17]  D. Clowe,et al.  A new look at massive clusters: weak lensing constraints on the triaxial dark matter haloes of A1689, A1835 and A2204 , 2008, 0812.0632.

[18]  D. Spergel,et al.  Shear-selected Cluster Cosmology: Tomography and Optimal Filtering , 2004, astro-ph/0404349.

[19]  GaBoDS: the Garching-Bonn Deep Survey. IX. A sample of 158 shear-selected mass concentration candidates , 2006, astro-ph/0607022.

[20]  J. Kneib,et al.  CATASTROPHIC PHOTO-z ERRORS AND THE DARK ENERGY PARAMETER ESTIMATES WITH COSMIC SHEAR , 2008, 0812.5083.

[21]  P. Schneider,et al.  BLOX: The Bonn Lensing, Optical, and X-ray selected galaxy clusters I. Cluster catalog construction ⋆ , ⋆⋆ , 2007, 0705.3455.

[22]  The dark clump near Abell 1942: dark matter halo or statistical fluke? , 2005, astro-ph/0501442.

[23]  M. Bartelmann,et al.  Weak gravitational lensing , 2016, Scholarpedia.

[24]  G. Bernstein,et al.  THE IMPACT OF CORRELATED PROJECTIONS ON WEAK LENSING CLUSTER COUNTS , 2009, 0912.0261.

[25]  P. Schneider,et al.  The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal , 2008, 0905.0393.

[26]  Christopher M. Hirata,et al.  Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear , 2004, astro-ph/0406275.

[27]  Naoki Yoshida,et al.  Searching for massive clusters in weak lensing surveys , 2003, astro-ph/0310607.

[28]  G. Bernstein,et al.  THE COSMOLOGY DEPENDENCE OF WEAK LENSING CLUSTER COUNTS , 2008, 0811.1991.

[29]  Sarah Bridle,et al.  Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements , 2007, 0705.0166.

[30]  Adam Amara,et al.  Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix , 2007, 0710.5171.

[31]  N. Kaiser,et al.  Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing , 1993 .

[32]  J. R. Bond,et al.  The statistics of cosmic background radiation fluctuations , 1987 .

[33]  Wayne Hu,et al.  Effects of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak-Lensing Tomography , 2005 .

[34]  J. P. Dietrich,et al.  Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics , 2009, 0906.3512.

[35]  Tucson,et al.  A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter , 2006, astro-ph/0608407.

[36]  Morgan May,et al.  Probing cosmology with weak lensing peak counts , 2009, 0907.0486.

[37]  Z. Fan Intrinsic Alignments of Galaxies and Their Effects on Weak-Lensing Detections of Mass Concentrations , 2007, 0706.3941.

[38]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Very weak lensing in the CFHTLS Wide: Cosmology from cosmic shear in the linear regime , 2007, 0712.0884.

[39]  Rachel Mandelbaum,et al.  Detection of large-scale intrinsic ellipticity—density correlation from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and implications for weak lensing surveys , 2006 .

[40]  S. More,et al.  Modelling galaxy-galaxy weak lensing with Sloan Digital Sky Survey groups , 2008, 0807.4934.

[41]  S. White,et al.  An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes , 1995, astro-ph/9512127.

[42]  P. Schneider Detection of (dark) matter concentrations via weak gravitational lensing , 1996, astro-ph/9601039.