Hidden Markov Model Analysis of Intermediate Gating Steps Associated with the Pore Gate of Shaker Potassium Channels

Cooperativity among the four subunits helps give rise to the remarkable voltage sensitivity of Shaker potassium channels, whose open probability changes tenfold for a 5-mV change in membrane potential. The cooperativity in these channels is thought to arise from a concerted structural transition as the final step in opening the channel. Recordings of single-channel ionic currents from certain other channel types, as well as our previous recordings from T442S mutant Shaker channels, however, display intermediate conductance levels in addition to the fully open and closed states. These sublevels might represent stepwise, rather than concerted, transitions in the final steps of channel activation. Here, we report a similar fine structure in the closing transitions of Shaker channels lacking the mutation. Describing the deactivation time course with hidden Markov models, we find that two subconductance levels are rapidly traversed during most closing transitions of chimeric, high conductance Shaker channels. The lifetimes of these levels are voltage-dependent, with maximal values of 52 and 22 μs at −100 mV, and the voltage dependences of transitions among these states suggest that they arise from equivalent conformational changes occurring in individual subunits. At least one subconductance level is found to be traversed in normal conductance Shaker channels. We speculate that voltage-dependent conformational changes in the subunits give rise to changes in a “pore gate” associated with the selectivity filter region of the channel, producing the subconductance states. As a control for the hidden Markov analysis, we applied the same procedures to recordings of the recovery from N-type inactivation in Shaker channels. These transitions are found to be instantaneous in comparison.

[1]  R. MacKinnon,et al.  A functional connection between the pores of distantly related ion channels as revealed by mutant K+ channels. , 1992, Science.

[2]  D. Baylor,et al.  Conductance and kinetics of single cGMP‐activated channels in salamander rod outer segments. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Baylor,et al.  Cyclic GMP-sensitive conductance of retinal rods consists of aqueous pores , 1986, Nature.

[4]  L. Baum,et al.  A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains , 1970 .

[5]  R A Levis,et al.  The use of quartz patch pipettes for low noise single channel recording. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[6]  V. Torre,et al.  Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Pore topology studied through the accessibility of reporter cysteines. , 1999 .

[7]  Roman Kuc,et al.  Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. II. State-dependent excess noise , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  S H Chung,et al.  Characterization of single channel currents using digital signal processing techniques based on Hidden Markov Models. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Y. Jan,et al.  Multiple potassium–channel components are produced by alternative splicing at the Shaker locus in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[10]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[11]  F Bezanilla,et al.  The voltage sensor in voltage-dependent ion channels. , 2000, Physiological reviews.

[12]  Roman Kuc,et al.  Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. I. Colored background noise , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Klaus Benndorf,et al.  Low-Noise Recording , 1995 .

[14]  T Hoshi,et al.  Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation , 1990, Science.

[15]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Activation of Shaker Potassium Channels , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  R. Aldrich,et al.  Restoration of inactivation in mutants of Shaker potassium channels by a peptide derived from ShB , 1990, Science.

[17]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of a voltage-gated potassium channel at 2.5 nm resolution. , 2001, Structure.

[18]  A. Brown,et al.  Histidine substitution identifies a surface position and confers Cs+ selectivity on a K+ pore. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[19]  S. Siegelbaum,et al.  Exposure of Residues in the Cyclic Nucleotide–Gated Channel Pore: P Region Structure and Function in Gating , 1996, Neuron.

[20]  W. N. Zagotta,et al.  Conformational Changes in S6 Coupled to the Opening of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels , 2001, Neuron.

[21]  Roman Kuc,et al.  Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents .III. Bandlimited, sampled data , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  V Krishnamurthy,et al.  Adaptive processing techniques based on hidden Markov models for characterizing very small channel currents buried in noise and deterministic interferences. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  R. MacKinnon,et al.  Potassium channel receptor site for the inactivation gate and quaternary amine inhibitors , 2001, Nature.

[24]  J. Mainland,et al.  Probing ion permeation and gating in a K+ channel with backbone mutations in the selectivity filter , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Y. Jan,et al.  Evidence that the S6 segment of the Shaker voltage-gated K+ channel comprises part of the pore , 1994, Nature.

[26]  S. Siegelbaum,et al.  Change of Pore Helix Conformational State upon Opening of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels , 2000, Neuron.

[27]  J. Rice,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation and identification directly from single-channel recordings , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  P. Ascher,et al.  Coupling of Permeation and Gating in an NMDA-Channel Pore Mutant , 1997, Neuron.

[29]  B. Chait,et al.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. , 1998, Science.

[30]  A. Brown,et al.  Differences between the deep pores of K+ channels determined by an interacting pair of nonpolar amino acids , 1992, Neuron.

[31]  F. Sigworth,et al.  Selectivity Changes during Activation of Mutant Shaker Potassium Channels , 1997, The Journal of general physiology.

[32]  J. W. Karpen,et al.  Single cyclic nucleotide-gated channels locked in different ligand-bound states , 1997, Nature.

[33]  R. MacKinnon.  Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of a voltage-activated potassium channel , 1991, Nature.

[34]  F Sachs,et al.  Hidden Markov modeling for single channel kinetics with filtering and correlated noise. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[35]  G. Yellen,et al.  The Activation Gate of a Voltage-Gated K+ Channel Can Be Trapped in the Open State by an Intersubunit Metal Bridge , 1998, Neuron.

[36]  E. Sunderman,et al.  Sequence of Events Underlying the Allosteric Transition of Rod Cyclic Nucleotide–gated Channels , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[37]  G. Yellen,et al.  Gated Access to the Pore of a Voltage-Dependent K+ Channel , 1997, Neuron.

[38]  E. Sunderman,et al.  Mechanism of Allosteric Modulation of Rod Cyclic Nucleotide–gated Channels , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[39]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single-Channel Records , 1983 .

[40]  R. MacKinnon,et al.  Mutations affecting internal TEA blockade identify the probable pore-forming region of a K+ channel , 1991, Science.

[41]  E. Perozo,et al.  Structural rearrangements underlying K+-channel activation gating. , 1999, Science.

[42]  C. Armstrong.  Interaction of Tetraethylammonium Ion Derivatives with the Potassium Channels of Giant Axons , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[43]  T. Schwarz,et al.  Interactions of the H5 pore region and hydroxylamine with N-type inactivation in the Shaker K+ channel. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[44]  F Bezanilla,et al.  Gating of Shaker K+ channels: II. The components of gating currents and a model of channel activation. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[45]  R Horn,et al.  Statistical methods for model discrimination. Applications to gating kinetics and permeation of the acetylcholine receptor channel. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[46]  K. Magleby,et al.  Opening and closing transitions for BK channels often occur in two steps via sojourns through a brief lifetime subconductance state. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[47]  T. Schwarz,et al.  Alteration of ionic selectivity of a K+ channel by mutation of the H5 region , 1991, Nature.

[48]  M. Tanouye,et al.  Multiple products of the drosophila Shaker gene may contribute to potassium channel diversity , 1988, Neuron.

[49]  G. Yellen,et al.  The moving parts of voltage-gated ion channels , 1998, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[50]  G. Yellen,et al.  Trapping of Organic Blockers by Closing of Voltage-dependent K+ Channels , 1997, The Journal of general physiology.

[51]  F. Sigworth,et al.  Intermediate Conductances during Deactivation of Heteromultimeric Shaker Potassium Channels , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.

[52]  F. Sigworth.  Electronic Design of the Patch Clamp , 1983 .

[53]  Jens Timmer,et al.  A new approximate likelihood estimator for ARMA-filtered hidden Markov models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[54]  T Hoshi,et al.  Shaker potassium channel gating. III: Evaluation of kinetic models for activation , 1994, The Journal of general physiology.

[55]  C F Stevens,et al.  The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. , 1998, Science.

[56]  A. VanDongen,et al.  Activation-dependent subconductance levels in the drk1 K channel suggest a subunit basis for ion permeation and gating. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Activation of Shaker Potassium Channels , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.