Summary In this paper it is proposed that the territory of governance is currently being reconfigured by the state. The state is pulling back from a universalist, welfare role, which entailed comprehensive governance of the whole national territory. Now a much more selective form of government is coming into being, concerned with ‘community’, ‘diversity’ and ‘locality’. This is not, however, simply a belated recognition by the state that these are ever more important features of socio-spatial life: rather, it is part of the reconfiguration of the territory of government as the state invokes these characteristics in order to modify its ways of governing. Using Foucault's concept of governmentality–that is the means used by the state to ‘problematise’ life within its territorial borders and then act on the basis of these problematisations—the recent case of the Rural White Paper is examined. It is proposed that this is a very clear example of a governmental retreat from a comprehensive role in the governance of rural areas and shows how the state now seeks to govern ‘through communities’.
[1]
J. Murdoch,et al.
Governmentality and territoriality: The statistical manufacture of Britain's ‘national farm’
,
1997
.
[2]
N. Rose.
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government
,
1996
.
[3]
M. Whitby,et al.
The planning of rural Britain.
,
1996
.
[4]
Ade Kearns,et al.
Active citizenship and local governance: political and geographical dimensions
,
1995
.
[5]
N. Rose.
Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism
,
1993
.
[6]
T. Marsden.
Constructing The Countryside
,
1993
.
[7]
N. Rose,et al.
Governing economic life
,
1990
.
[8]
T. O'riordan,et al.
Countryside Conflicts: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation@@@Nature's Place: Conservation Sites and Countryside Change
,
1986
.
[9]
P. Hall.
The containment of urban England
,
1974
.
[10]
P. Self,et al.
The State and the Farmer
,
2023,
Nature.