Multi-feature objects elicit nonconscious priming despite crowding.

The conscious representation we build from the visual environment appears jumbled in the periphery, reflecting a phenomenon known as crowding. Yet, it remains possible that object-level representations (i.e., resulting from the binding of the stimulus' different features) are preserved even if they are not consciously accessible. With a paradigm involving gaze-contingent substitution, which allows us to ensure the constant absence of peripheral stimulus discrimination, we show that, despite their jumbled appearance, multi-feature crowded objects, such as faces and directional symbols, are encoded in a nonconscious manner and can influence subsequent behavior. Furthermore, we show that the encoding of complex crowded contents is modulated by attention in the absence of consciousness. These results, in addition to bringing new insights concerning the fate of crowded information, illustrate the potential of the Gaze-Contingent Crowding (GCC) approach for probing nonconscious cognition.

[1]  Sebastian Weisdorf,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 2001 .

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[3]  Fang Fang,et al.  Crowding alters the spatial distribution of attention modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Subliminal number priming within and across the visual and auditory modalities. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[6]  Richard N. Henson,et al.  Activity in Face-Responsive Brain Regions is Modulated by Invisible, Attended Faces: Evidence from Masked Priming , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[9]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The perception of spatial order at a glance , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Pelli Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognition , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  D. Pelli,et al.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[12]  David Whitney,et al.  Holistic crowding of Mooney faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  E. Louie,et al.  Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. , 2007, Journal of Vision.

[19]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari,et al.  Subliminal attentional modulation in crowding condition , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses) , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[25]  Peter Neri,et al.  Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[27]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[28]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[29]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Symbolic action priming relies on intact neural transmission along the retino-geniculo-striate pathway , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Partial Awareness Creates the “Illusion” of Subliminal Semantic Priming , 2004, Psychological science.

[31]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[33]  Sid Kouider,et al.  How Spatial Frequencies and Visual Awareness Interact During Face Processing , 2010, Psychological science.

[34]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  M. Damian,et al.  Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  How Rich Is Consciousness? the Partial Awareness Hypothesis Opinion , 2022 .

[37]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral bases of subliminal and supraliminal priming during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.