Matroid prophet inequalities and applications to multi-dimensional mechanism design

Abstract Consider a gambler who observes a sequence of independent random numbers and is allowed to stop at any time, claiming reward equal to the most recent observation. The famous prophet inequality of Krengel, Sucheston, and Garling asserts that a gambler who knows the distribution of each random variable can achieve half as much reward, in expectation, as a “prophet” who knows the sampled values and can choose the largest one. We generalize this result to settings in which the gambler and the prophet are allowed to make multiple selections, subject to a matroid constraint, showing that the gambler can still achieve half as much reward as the prophet. Our results imply improved bounds on the ability of sequential posted-price mechanisms to approximate optimal mechanisms in single-parameter and multi-parameter Bayesian settings. In particular, we provide the first efficiently computable constant-factor approximations to the Bayesian optimal revenue in certain multi-parameter settings.

[1]  U. Krengel,et al.  Semiamarts and finite values , 1977 .

[2]  Peng Shi,et al.  Approximation algorithms for restless bandit problems , 2007, JACM.

[3]  Ashish Goel,et al.  The ratio index for budgeted learning, with applications , 2008, SODA.

[4]  Patrick Jaillet,et al.  Advances on Matroid Secretary Problems: Free Order Model and Laminar Case , 2012, IPCO.

[5]  D. P. Kennedy Optimal Stopping of Independent Random Variables and Maximizing Prophets , 1985 .

[6]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  On Variants of the Matroid Secretary Problem , 2011, ESA.

[7]  Qiqi Yan,et al.  Mechanism design via correlation gap , 2010, SODA '11.

[8]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms , 2007, SODA '07.

[9]  R. P. Kertz Comparison of optimal value and constrained maxima expectations for independent random variables , 1986 .

[10]  Michael Dinitz,et al.  Matroid Secretary for Regular and Decomposable Matroids , 2012, SIAM J. Comput..

[11]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2009, STOC '10.

[12]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Multi-armed Bandits with Metric Switching Costs , 2009, ICALP.

[13]  Martin Pál,et al.  Algorithms for Secretary Problems on Graphs and Hypergraphs , 2008, ICALP.

[14]  E. Samuel-Cahn Comparison of Threshold Stop Rules and Maximum for Independent Nonnegative Random Variables , 1984 .

[15]  Jason D. Hartline Approximation in mechanism design , 2010, BQGT.

[16]  José A. Soto,et al.  Matroid secretary problem in the random assignment model , 2010, SODA '11.

[17]  C. Greg Plaxton,et al.  Competitive Weighted Matching in Transversal Matroids , 2008, ICALP.

[18]  Saeed Alaei,et al.  Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[19]  Sourav Chakraborty,et al.  Improved competitive ratio for the matroid secretary problem , 2012, SODA.

[20]  T. Hill,et al.  A Survey of Prophet Inequalities in Optimal Stopping Theory , 1992 .

[21]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Approximating the stochastic knapsack problem: the benefit of adaptivity , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[22]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[23]  D. P. Kennedy Prophet-type inequalities for multi-choice optimal stopping , 1987 .