Modeling Wildfire Incident Complexity Dynamics

Wildfire management in the United States and elsewhere is challenged by substantial uncertainty regarding the location and timing of fire events, the socioeconomic and ecological consequences of these events, and the costs of suppression. Escalating U.S. Forest Service suppression expenditures is of particular concern at a time of fiscal austerity as swelling fire management budgets lead to decreases for non-fire programs, and as the likelihood of disruptive within-season borrowing potentially increases. Thus there is a strong interest in better understanding factors influencing suppression decisions and in turn their influence on suppression costs. As a step in that direction, this paper presents a probabilistic analysis of geographic and temporal variation in incident management team response to wildfires. The specific focus is incident complexity dynamics through time for fires managed by the U.S. Forest Service. The modeling framework is based on the recognition that large wildfire management entails recurrent decisions across time in response to changing conditions, which can be represented as a stochastic dynamic system. Daily incident complexity dynamics are modeled according to a first-order Markov chain, with containment represented as an absorbing state. A statistically significant difference in complexity dynamics between Forest Service Regions is demonstrated. Incident complexity probability transition matrices and expected times until containment are presented at national and regional levels. Results of this analysis can help improve understanding of geographic variation in incident management and associated cost structures, and can be incorporated into future analyses examining the economic efficiency of wildfire management.

[1]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Inference about Markov Chains , 1957 .

[2]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation , 2011 .

[3]  D. Alderson,et al.  Dynamic Resource Allocation in Disaster Response: Tradeoffs in Wildfire Suppression , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Krista M. Gebert,et al.  Spatially explicit forecasts of large wildland fire probability and suppression costs for California , 2011 .

[5]  Joseph Y. J. Chow,et al.  Resource Location and Relocation Models with Rolling Horizon Forecasting for Wildland Fire Planning , 2011, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[6]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Estimating Suppression Expenditures for Individual Large Wildland Fires , 2007 .

[7]  David A. Stanford,et al.  A stochastic forest fire growth model , 2009, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[8]  John Handmer,et al.  A review of operations research methods applicable to wildfire management , 2012 .

[9]  D. Calkin,et al.  Factors influencing large wildland fire suppression expenditures , 2008 .

[10]  Avi Bar Massada,et al.  Housing Arrangement and Location Determine the Likelihood of Housing Loss Due to Wildfire , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Lynn A Maguire,et al.  Managing Wildfire Events: Risk‐Based Decision Making Among a Group of Federal Fire Managers , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  J. Prestemon,et al.  Wildfire Suppression Cost Forecasts for the US Forest Service , 2009, Journal of Forestry.

[14]  D. Driscoll,et al.  Land Management Practices Associated with House Loss in Wildfires , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Lisa M. Elenz,et al.  Developing the US Wildland Fire Decision Support System , 2011 .

[16]  David L. Martell,et al.  A Markov chain model of day to day changes in the Canadian forest fire weather index , 1999 .

[17]  T. Hatton,et al.  Fire spread through nonhomogeneous fuel modelled as a Markov process , 1989 .

[18]  K. Gebert,et al.  An econometric model for ex ante prediction of wildfire suppression costs , 2012 .

[19]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure , 2010 .

[20]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A real-time risk assessment tool supporting wildland fire decisionmaking , 2011 .

[21]  Byron K. Williams,et al.  Markov decision processes in natural resources management: Observability and uncertainty , 2009 .

[22]  D. Boychuk,et al.  A markov chain model for evaluating seasonal forest fire fighter requirements , 1988 .

[23]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  The Effect of Newspaper Coverage and Political Pressure on Wildfire Suppression Costs , 2011 .

[24]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A Risk-Based Approach to Wildland Fire Budgetary Planning , 2013 .

[25]  David A. Stanford,et al.  A stochastic model for generating disturbance patterns within landscapes , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[26]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Estimating US federal wildland fire managers’ preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives , 2013 .

[27]  Avi Bar Massada,et al.  Allocating fuel breaks to optimally protect structures in the wildland-urban interface , 2011 .

[28]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  On the need for a theory of wildland fire spread , 2013 .

[29]  Donald G. MacGregor,et al.  Decision Modeling for Analyzing Fire Action Outcomes , 2011 .

[30]  B. Williams Adaptive management of natural resources--framework and issues. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Modeling Containment of Large Wildfires Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Analysis , 2009, Forest Science.

[32]  R. Schreyer,et al.  THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. , 1901, Science.

[33]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values , 2011 .

[34]  K. Gebert,et al.  Effect of Suppression Strategies on Federal Wildland Fire Expenditures , 2012 .