Operational characteristics of a 50 W DMFC stack

Abstract The characteristics of a 50 W direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) stack were investigated under various operating conditions in order to understand the behavior of the stack. The operating variables included the methanol concentration, the flow rate and the flow direction of the reactants (methanol and air) in the stack. The temperature of the stack was autonomously increased in proportion to the magnitude of the electric load, but it decreased with an increase in the flow rates of the reactants. Although the operation of the stack was initiated at room temperature, under a certain condition the internal temperature of the stack was higher than 80 °C. A uniform distribution of the reactants to all the cells was a key factor in determining the performance of the stack. With the supply of 2 M methanol, a maximum power of the stack was found to be 54 W (85 mW cm −2 ) in air and 98 W (154 mW cm −2 ) in oxygen. Further, the system with counter-flow reactants produced a power output that was 20% higher than that of co-flow system. A post-load behavior of the stack was also studied by varying the electric load at various operating conditions.

[1]  Musuwathi Krishnamoorthy Ravikumar,et al.  Effect of Methanol Crossover in a Liquid‐Feed Polymer‐Electrolyte Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 1996 .

[2]  Rongzhong Jiang,et al.  Determination of energy efficiency for a direct methanol fuel cell stack by a fuel circulation method , 2004 .

[3]  Ramana G. Reddy,et al.  Materials and design development for bipolar/end plates in fuel cells , 2004 .

[4]  W. M. Taama,et al.  The impact of mass transport and methanol crossover on the direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[5]  Keith Scott,et al.  The effect of operating conditions on the dynamic response of the direct methanol fuel cell , 2000 .

[6]  Christopher Hebling,et al.  Fuel Cells for Low Power Applications , 2002 .

[7]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  A model for the liquid feed direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[8]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Development of a compact 500 W class direct methanol fuel cell stack , 2002 .

[9]  E. Modica,et al.  Development and operation of a 150 W air-feed direct methanol fuel cell stack , 2001 .

[10]  Ho-In Lee,et al.  Influence of the solvent in anode catalyst ink on the performance of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[11]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  The effect of pretreatment methods on the performance of passive DMFCs , 2004 .

[12]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  International activities in DMFC R&D: status of technologies and potential applications , 2004 .

[13]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Recent progress in passive direct methanol fuel cells at KIST , 2004 .

[14]  Rongzhong Jiang,et al.  Stack design and performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2001 .

[15]  W. M. Taama,et al.  An investigation of scale-up on the response of the direct methanol fuel cell under variable load conditions , 2001 .

[16]  Emanuel Peled,et al.  Water-neutral micro direct-methanol fuel cell (DMFC) for portable applications , 2003 .

[17]  Kaspar Andreas Friedrich,et al.  Performance and methanol permeation of direct methanol fuel cells: dependence on operating conditions and on electrode structure , 2004 .

[18]  Zhigang Qi,et al.  Open circuit voltage and methanol crossover in DMFCs , 2002 .