Modelling soil organic carbon concentration of mineral soils in arable land using legacy soil data

Soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration is an essential factor in biomass production and soil functioning. SOC concentration values are often obtained by prediction but the prediction accuracy depends much on the method used. Currently, there is a lack of evidence in the soil science literature as to the advantages and shortcomings of the different commonly used prediction methods. Therefore, we compared and evaluated the merits of the median approach, analysis of covariance, mixed models and random forests in the context of prediction of SOC concentrations of mineral soils under arable management in the A‐horizon. Three soil properties were used in all of the developed models: soil type, physical clay content (particle size <0.01 mm) and A‐horizon thickness. We found that the mixed model predicted SOC concentrations with the smallest mean squared error (0.05%2), suggesting that a mixed‐model approach is appropriate if the study design has a hierarchical structure as in our scenario. We used the Estonian National Soil Monitoring data on arable lands to predict SOC concentrations of mineral soils. Subsequently, the model with the best prediction accuracy was applied to the Estonian digital soil map for the case study area of Tartu County where the SOC predictions ranged from 0.6 to 4.8%. Our study indicates that predictions using legacy soil maps can be used in national inventories and for up‐scaling estimates of carbon concentrations from county to country scales.

[1]  C. Ritz,et al.  Soil bulk density pedotransfer functions of the humus horizon in arable soils , 2011 .

[2]  M. Wiesmeier,et al.  Digital mapping of soil organic matter stocks using Random Forest modeling in a semi-arid steppe ecosystem , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[3]  D. Powlson,et al.  Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re‐examination to identify the true and the false , 2011 .

[4]  R. Lark,et al.  A linear mixed model, with non-stationary mean and covariance, for soil potassium based on gamma radiometry , 2010 .

[5]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Pedometric mapping of soil organic matter using a soil map with quantified uncertainty , 2010 .

[6]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Predicting the spatial variation of the soil organic carbon pool at a regional scale. , 2010 .

[7]  R. Kõlli,et al.  Erosion-affected soils in the Estonian landscape: Humus status, patterns and classification , 2010 .

[8]  K. Van Oost,et al.  Driving forces of soil organic carbon evolution at the landscape and regional scale using data from a stratified soil monitoring , 2009 .

[9]  J. Meersmans,et al.  Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: a comparison between the Walkley & Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium) , 2009 .

[10]  M. Bell,et al.  Estimating a region's soil organic carbon baseline: The undervalued role of land-management , 2009 .

[11]  Jeroen Meersmans,et al.  Modelling the three-dimensional spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium) , 2009 .

[12]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Relationships in soil distribution as revealed by a global soil database , 2009 .

[13]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stock Using Profile Depth Distribution Functions and Ordinary Kriging , 2009 .

[14]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Soil organic carbon concentrations and stocks on Barro Colorado Island — Digital soil mapping using Random Forests analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Pete Smith,et al.  Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics , 2008, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[16]  Frank Canters,et al.  A multiple regression approach to assess the spatial distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium) , 2008 .

[17]  B. Minasny,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties using EBLUP with the Matérn covariance function , 2007 .

[18]  R. Lark,et al.  On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E‐BLUP) with REML , 2006 .

[19]  H. Palang,et al.  Large-scale soil maps and a supplementary database for land use planning in Estonia , 2003 .

[20]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems , 2002 .

[21]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[22]  K. Leuven,et al.  Letter to the Editor on “World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB), IUSS Endorsement, World-Wide Testing, and Validation” , 2000 .

[23]  N. Batjes,et al.  Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world , 1996 .

[24]  Stephen M. Ogle,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon storage under different agricultural management systems in the Southwest Amazon Region of Brazil , 2010 .

[25]  G. Pan,et al.  How can soil monitoring networks be used to improve predictions of organic carbon pool dynamics and CO2 fluxes in agricultural soils? , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[26]  Jones Arwyn,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring: Volume IIb Survey of National Networks , 2008 .

[27]  T. Ochsner,et al.  Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? , 2007 .

[28]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[29]  R. Kõlli,et al.  Humus status of postlithogenic arable mineral soils , 2003 .

[30]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001, Statistical Science.

[31]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .