Electronic and face-to-face communication in maintaining social relationships

Although the spectacular spread of wired and wireless communication technologies such as the Internet and mobile phone have been discussed extensively in the academic literature, knowledge of the interactions among face-to-face (F2F) and electronic communication modes and their implications for travel behavior is rather limited. The same is true for knowledge about factors influencing the choice for these types of communication. Using survey data collected among 662 respondents, this paper aims to gain more insight into (i) the interaction between F2F and electronic contacts, (ii) the influence of information content and relational distance on the choice of the communication mode/service, and (iii) the influence of relational and geographical distance, in addition to various other factors, on the frequency of F2F and electronically mediated contacts with relatives and friends. Bivariate correlation analysis indicates that the frequency of F2F contacts is positively correlated with that for electronic communication, which points at a generation effect. With respect to the impact of information content and relational distance, we find that such synchronous modes/services as F2F and telephone conversations are used more for urgent matters and that asynchronous modes (especially e-mail) become more influential as the relational distance in the social network increases. Finally, ordered probit analyses confirm that both F2F and electronic communication frequencies decline with increasing physical and relational distance to the social network members.

[1]  Daisuke Okabe,et al.  The Mobile-izing Japanese: Connecting to the Internet by PC and Webphone in Yamanashi , 2006 .

[2]  John Urry,et al.  Social networks, travel and talk. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[3]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review , 1986 .

[4]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[6]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Social networks and future mobilities , 2005 .

[7]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[8]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  BEYOND TELE-SUBSTITUTION: DISAGGREGATE LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING OF COMMUNICATION IMPACTS. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[9]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  A Typology of Relationships Between Telecommunications and Transportation , 1990 .

[10]  Jonathan Gershuny,et al.  MASS MEDIA, LEISURE AND HOME IT: A PANEL TIME-DIARY APPROACH , 2002 .

[11]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[12]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Syntopia: Access, Civic Involvement, and Social Interaction on the Net , 2008 .

[13]  C. Licoppe,et al.  From voice to text : continuity and change in the use of mobile phones in France and Japan , 2005 .

[14]  Deirdre Boden,et al.  The Compulsion of Proximity , 1993 .

[15]  Volker G. Täube,et al.  Connected and Disconnected? On the Impact of Internet Use on Social Connectedness , 2004, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[16]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach , 2006 .

[17]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  AGENCY IN SOCIAL ACTIVITY INTERACTIONS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN TIME AND SPACE , 2008 .

[18]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .