On the Social-Communicative Function of Justice: The Influence of Communication Goals and Personal Involvement on the Use of Justice Assertions

This article reveals how people strategically use justice assertions when attempting to persuade others. In three studies participants communicated about a negative situation they or someone else had experienced and did so in a persuasive manner (Studies 1-3), an accurate manner (Study 1), by asking for an opinion (Study 2), or without a communication goal (Studies 1 and 3). Communicators who had a persuasion goal used more justice-related words than communicators who had a goal to be accurate, asked for an opinion, or had no goal. This was particularly the case when communications were about someone else rather than the participants themselves and for those high in self-monitoring whose identities were known (vs. anonymous). The article concludes that people use justice-related words in attempts to persuade others, but only when they know there is no doubt about their personal involvement. Implications are discussed.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Audience Design in Meaning and Reference , 1982 .

[2]  H. Alves,et al.  On the Normativity of Expressing the Belief in a Just World: Empirical Evidence , 2008 .

[3]  M. Wenzel,et al.  Justice and Social Conflict , 2000 .

[4]  R. Folger.  The Sense of Injustice , 1984 .

[5]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  A. Hossain,et al.  A comparative study on detection of influential observations in linear regression , 1991 .

[7]  N. J. Finkel,et al.  But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness. , 2000 .

[8]  O. Klein,et al.  Prejudice on the stage: self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[11]  R. Petty,et al.  Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  G. Blickle,et al.  The Effects of (Un-)Fairness and (Im-)Politeness on the Evaluation of Argumentative Communication , 1995 .

[13]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range , 1991 .

[14]  R. Dodhia.  A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[15]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[16]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Agenda 2000: Communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. , 2000 .

[17]  R. Cook.  Detection of influential observation in linear regression , 2000 .

[18]  Robert Folger,et al.  The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives , 2011 .

[19]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers' attitudes and goals. , 2006 .

[20]  N. Epley,et al.  Egocentric Ethics , 2004 .

[21]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Self-Monitoring : Appraisal and Reappraisal , 2001 .

[22]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Disrespect and the experience of injustice. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  K. van den Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. , 2002 .

[24]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution : Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification , 1998 .

[25]  D. Premack,et al.  Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. , 1978, Science.

[26]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[27]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[28]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[30]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[31]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[32]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Not fair for me! : the influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences , 2008 .

[33]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The Justice Motive in Everyday Life: Essays in Honor of Melvin J. Lerner , 2002 .

[34]  Cheryl R. Kaiser,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Kaiser, Miller / REACTING TO IMPENDING DISCRIMINATION Reacting to Impending Discrimination: Compensation for Prejudice and Attributions to Discrimination , 2001 .

[35]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework , 1989 .

[36]  J. Flavell.  Perspectives on perspective taking. , 1992 .

[37]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[38]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[39]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .

[41]  P. B. Pufall,et al.  Piaget's Theory : Prospects and Possibilities , 1992 .

[42]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan.  The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[43]  H. Reis.  The Multidimensionality of Justice , 1984 .

[44]  C. Hafer,et al.  Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  N. J. Finkel.  Not Fair!: The Typology of Commonsense Unfairness , 2001 .

[46]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer? , 1996 .

[47]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[49]  K van den Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[51]  E. Lind.  Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .

[52]  T. Tyler,et al.  Procedural strategies for gaining deference: Increasing social harmony or creating false consciousness? , 2001 .

[53]  E. Lind,et al.  The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest , 1996 .

[54]  Robert Folger,et al.  Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[55]  R. Folger.  Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. , 1977 .

[56]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  The Winding Road from Employee to Complainant: Situational and Psychological Determinants of Wrongful-Termination Claims , 2000 .

[57]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .