Relationship between cranial base structure and maxillofacial components in children aged 3-5 years.

The aim of this study was to clarify the inter-relationships between cranial base angle, the morphological variations of maxillofacial components, and growth of the anterior cranial base length. One hundred and twenty-two Japanese children aged 3-5 years with normal occlusion in the primary dentition were included in this investigation. To analyse the relationship between cranial base structure and maxillofacial components, the subjects were divided into three groups according to facial type (prognathic, orthognathic, or retrognathic) assessed by the magnitude of their NSAr angle (as cranial base angle). These categorized cephalometric profiles suggested that the antero-posterior location of the maxillofacial components corresponded to the NSAr angle. Factor analysis of cephalometric variables showed that the variation of maxillofacial components from the S-N line was strongly related to the cranial base angle. This normal range of morphological variation was distinguished from that of growth by the factor loadings. From these results, theoretical models of cephalometric profiles with normal occlusion were computed by linear regression analysis. Using the models, a standard profile related to an arbitrary cranial base angle was obtained for children with normal occlusion, aged 3-5 years.

[1]  D Segner,et al.  Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns. , 1989, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  D. Enlow,et al.  The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. , 1971, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  L. Franchi,et al.  Floating norms for the assessment of craniofacial pattern in the deciduous dentition. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  E. Begole,et al.  Craniofacial morphology: a principal component analysis. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[5]  S. Bishara,et al.  Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[6]  Lorenzo Franchi,et al.  Floating norms for the assessment of craniofacial pattern in the deciduous dentition. , 1996 .

[7]  P. Bayati,et al.  Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: a longitudinal study. , 1997, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  C. Lavelle A study of craniofacial form. , 1979, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  J. McNamara,et al.  The neurocranial basis for facial form and pattern. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  K. Kasai,et al.  Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology. , 1995, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  Seppo Järvinen,et al.  Saddle Angle and Maxillary Prognathism: A Radiological Analysis of the Association between the NSAr and SNA Angles , 1984, British journal of orthodontics.

[12]  F. Popovich,et al.  Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.