New Method for Beat-to-Beat Fetal Heart Rate Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal

The most commonly used method of fetal monitoring is based on heart activity analysis. Computer-aided fetal monitoring system enables extraction of clinically important information hidden for visual interpretation—the instantaneous fetal heart rate (FHR) variability. Today’s fetal monitors are based on monitoring of mechanical activity of the fetal heart by means of Doppler ultrasound technique. The FHR is determined using autocorrelation methods, and thus it has a form of evenly spaced—every 250 ms—instantaneous measurements, where some of which are incorrect or duplicate. The parameters describing a beat-to-beat FHR variability calculated from such a signal show significant errors. The aim of our research was to develop new analysis methods that will both improve an accuracy of the FHR determination and provide FHR representation as time series of events. The study was carried out on simultaneously recorded (during labor) Doppler ultrasound signal and the reference direct fetal electrocardiogram Two subranges of Doppler bandwidths were separated to describe heart wall movements and valve motions. After reduction of signal complexity by determining the Doppler ultrasound envelope, the signal was analyzed to determine the FHR. The autocorrelation method supported by a trapezoidal prediction function was used. In the final stage, two different methods were developed to provide signal representation as time series of events: the first using correction of duplicate measurements and the second based on segmentation of instantaneous periodicity measurements. Thus, it ensured the mean heart interval measurement error of only 1.35 ms. In a case of beat-to-beat variability assessment the errors ranged from −1.9% to −10.1%. Comparing the obtained values to other published results clearly confirms that the new methods provides a higher accuracy of an interval measurement and a better reliability of the FHR variability estimation.

[1]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Automated Estimation of Fetal Cardiac Timing Events From Doppler Ultrasound Signal Using Hybrid Models , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[2]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis,et al.  A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[4]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Doppler ultrasound compared with electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry cardiac triggering: A pilot study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J A Crowe,et al.  Data compression of fetal Doppler ultrasound audio signals using zero-crossings analysis. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Yasnitsky Leonid Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing , 2019 .

[7]  Denis Kouame,et al.  New Estimators and Guidelines for Better Use of Fetal Heart Rate Estimators with Doppler Ultrasound Devices , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[8]  Radek Martinek,et al.  Non-Adaptive Methods of Fetal ECG Signal Processing , 2017 .

[9]  G S Dawes,et al.  A comparison of two fetal heart rate ultrasound detector systems. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  D. L. Tuck Improvement in Doppler ultrasound human foetal heart rate records by signal correlation , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  Paul Hamelmann,et al.  An Extended Kalman Filter for Fetal Heart Location Estimation During Doppler-Based Heart Rate Monitoring , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Extraction of Fetal Heart-Rate Signal as the Time Event Series From Evenly Sampled Data Acquired Using Doppler Ultrasound Technique , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Early predicting a risk of preterm labour by analysis of antepartum electrohysterograhic signals , 2016 .

[14]  Paul Hamelmann,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound Technology for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Review , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[16]  G. Dawes,et al.  Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Determination of fetal heart rate from abdominal signals: evaluation of beat-to-beat accuracy in relation to the direct fetal electrocardiogram , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[18]  T Akatsuka,et al.  Fetal heart variability indices and the accuracy of variability measurements. , 1987, American journal of perinatology.

[19]  Aydin Akan,et al.  A test and simulation device for Doppler-based fetal heart rate monitoring , 2015 .

[20]  Guglielmo Frigo,et al.  Comparative evaluation of on-line missing data regression techniques in intrapartum FHR measurements , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[21]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Influence of gestation age on the performance of adaptive systems for fetal ECG extraction , 2017 .

[22]  Janusz Wrobel,et al.  Analysis of extracted cardiotocographic signal features to improve automated prediction of fetal outcome , 2010 .

[23]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Improvement in Fetal Heart Periodicity Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal , 2011 .

[24]  J. A. Crowe,et al.  The information content of Doppler ultrasound signals from the fetal heart , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[25]  Adam Gacek,et al.  Fetal heart rate variability: clinical experts versus computerized system interpretation , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[26]  Maria Romano,et al.  Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of Foetal Heart Rate Variability with Traditional Indexes: A Critical Survey , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[27]  Jacek M. Leski,et al.  Classification Based on Incremental Fuzzy (1+p) ( 1 + p ) -Means Clustering , 2015, ICMMI.

[28]  T. Wilmshurst,et al.  Antenatal measurement of beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variation: accuracy of the Hewlett-Packard ultrasound autocorrelation technique , 1986 .

[29]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Computerized Cardiotocography: A Software to Generate Synthetic Signals , 2014 .

[30]  Paul Hamelmann,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Implemented by Dynamic Adaptation of Transmission Power of a Flexible Ultrasound Transducer Array , 2019, Sensors.

[31]  M. Sankhe,et al.  An Estimate of Fetal Autonomic State by Time Spectral and Nonlinear Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate Variability , 2016 .

[32]  Adam Pawlak,et al.  Selected design issues of the medical cyber-physical system for telemonitoring pregnancy at home , 2016, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[34]  Jean-Marc Girault,et al.  Robust estimation of fetal heart rate from US Doppler signals , 2010 .

[35]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[36]  Adam Gacek,et al.  A new approach to cardiotocographic fetal monitoring based on analysis of bioelectrical signals , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[37]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Automated detection of uterine contractions in tocography signals – Comparison of algorithms , 2016 .

[38]  Maria Romano,et al.  An algorithm for the recovery of fetal heart rate series from CTG data , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[39]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of ICA and PCA in Extraction of Fetal ECG From Abdominal Signals: Toward Non-invasive Fetal Monitoring , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[40]  E H Hon,et al.  Limitations of autocorrelation in fetal heart rate monitoring. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  H W Jongsma,et al.  Analysis of heart rate and beat-to-beat variability: Interval difference index. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[42]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Comparison of Doppler ultrasound and direct electrocardiography acquisition techniques for quantification of fetal heart rate variability , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  M. E. George,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a new ultrasonic fetal heart rate monitor. , 1976, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[44]  Shihab Jimaa,et al.  Fetal Cardiac Doppler Signal Processing Techniques: Challenges and Future Research Directions , 2017, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[45]  M F Docker,et al.  Doppler ultrasound monitoring technology , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[46]  R. Berendsen,et al.  Beat-to-beat detection of fetal heart rate: Doppler ultrasound cardiotocography compared to direct ECG cardiotocography in time and frequency domain. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[47]  Jacek M. Leski,et al.  Clustering with Pairs of Prototypes to Support Automated Assessment of the Fetal State , 2016, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[48]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome. , 2013, Ginekologia polska.

[49]  Jerzy Sikora,et al.  Recognition of premature threatening labour symptoms from bioelectrical uterine activity signals , 2011 .

[50]  Chiou Peng Lam,et al.  Towards higher accuracy and better noise-tolerance for fetal heart rate monitoring using Doppler ultrasound , 2009, TENCON 2009 - 2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[51]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Classification of Uterine Electrical Activity Patterns for Early Detection of Preterm Birth , 2013, CORES.

[52]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  Cardiotocography and beyond: a review of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound application in fetal monitoring , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[53]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Evaluating the fetal heart rate baseline estimation algorithms by their influence on detection of clinically important patterns , 2016 .

[54]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Coping with limitations of fetal monitoring instrumentation to improve heart rhythm variability assessment , 2020 .

[55]  J. Wrobel,et al.  Timing events in Doppler ultrasound signal of fetal heart activity , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[56]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Model-Based Estimation of Aortic and Mitral Valves Opening and Closing Timings in Developing Human Fetuses , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[57]  Radek Martinek,et al.  Non-Adaptive Methods for Fetal ECG Signal Processing: A Review and Appraisal , 2018, Sensors.

[58]  M Y Divon,et al.  Autocorrelation techniques in fetal monitoring. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  L. Lhotska,et al.  Stability of variability features computed from fetal heart rate with artifcially infused missing data , 2012, 2012 Computing in Cardiology.

[60]  G S Dawes,et al.  A comparison of ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and direct electrocardiogram fetal heart rate detector systems. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[61]  R. Martínek,et al.  Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation? , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[62]  Gari D. Clifford,et al.  Template-based Quality Assessment of the Doppler Ultrasound Signal for Fetal Monitoring , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[63]  G. Adam,et al.  Evaluation of a Portable Doppler Ultrasound Gating Device for Fetal Cardiac MR Imaging: Initial Results at 1.5T and 3T , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[64]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Antepartum non-invasive evaluation of opening and closing timings of the cardiac valves in fetal cardiac cycle , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[65]  Maria Romano,et al.  Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[66]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of the effect of different sampling modes on computer analysis of cardiotocograms , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[67]  J A M van Scheepen,et al.  Effect of signal acquisition method on the fetal heart rate analysis with phase rectified signal averaging. , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[68]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  On Periodicity Detection and Structural Periodic Similarity , 2005, SDM.

[69]  Maria Romano,et al.  Software for computerised analysis of cardiotocographic traces , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..