Two Compact Cas9 Ortholog-Based Cytosine Base Editors Expand the DNA Targeting Scope and Applications In Vitro and In Vivo

CRISPR/Cas9-based base editing tools enable precise genomic installation and hold great promise for gene therapy, whereas the big size of Cas9 nucleases and its reliability on specific protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences as well as target site preferences restrict the extensive applications of base editing tools. Here, we generate two cytosine base editors (CBEs) by fusing cytidine deaminases with two compact codon-optimized Cas9 orthologs from Streptococcus_gordonii_str._Challis_substr._CH1 (ancSgo-BE4) and Streptococcus_thermophilus_LMG_18311 (ancSth1a-BE4), which are much smaller than Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) and recognize NNAAAG and NHGYRAA PAM sequences, respectively. Both CBEs display high activity, high fidelity, a different editing window, and low by-products for cytosine base editing with minimal DNA and RNA off-targeting activities in mammalian cells. Moreover, both editors show comparable or higher editing efficiencies than two engineered SpCas9 variant (SpCas9-NG and SpRY)-based CBEs in our tested target sites, which perfectly match the PAM sequences for ancSgo-BE4 or ancSth1a-BE4. In addition, we successfully generate two mouse models harboring clinically relevant mutations at the Ar gene via ancSgo-BE4 and ancSth1a-BE4, which display androgen insensitivity syndrome and/or developmental lethality in founder mice. Thus, the two novel CBEs broaden the base editing tool kits with expanded targeting scope and window for efficient gene modification and applications, respectively.

[1]  Guangdun Peng,et al.  Base editing‐mediated perturbation of endogenous PKM1/2 splicing facilitates isoform‐specific functional analysis in vitro and in vivo , 2021, Cell proliferation.

[2]  Hanhui Ma,et al.  Eliminating base-editor-induced genome-wide and transcriptome-wide off-target mutations , 2021, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  Liping Li,et al.  Structure-guided engineering of adenine base editor with minimized RNA off-targeting activity , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  Yufeng Shen,et al.  Functional interrogation of DNA damage response variants with base editing screens , 2021, Cell.

[5]  Yiping Qi,et al.  PAM-less plant genome editing using a CRISPR–SpRY toolbox , 2021, Nature Plants.

[6]  David R. Liu,et al.  In Vivo Base Editing Rescues Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome in Mice , 2020, Nature.

[7]  Joshua K Young,et al.  A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs , 2020, Nature Communications.

[8]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities , 2020, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[9]  Wenxian Sun,et al.  SpRY greatly expands the genome editing scope in rice with highly flexible PAM recognition , 2020, Genome Biology.

[10]  J. Gan,et al.  Catalytic-state structure and engineering of Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9 , 2020, Nature Catalysis.

[11]  S. Bae,et al.  Current Status and Challenges of DNA Base Editing Tools. , 2020, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[12]  David R. Liu,et al.  Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  David R. Liu,et al.  In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness , 2020, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Xiaochen Bo,et al.  High-resolution annotation of the mouse preimplantation embryo transcriptome using long-read sequencing , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  Hui Yang,et al.  A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects , 2020, Nature Methods.

[16]  C. Landry,et al.  Perturbing proteomes at single residue resolution using base editing , 2020, Nature Communications.

[17]  Benjamin P. Kleinstiver,et al.  Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants , 2020, Science.

[18]  Chengdong Zhang,et al.  A compact Cas9 ortholog from Staphylococcus Auricularis (SauriCas9) expands the DNA targeting scope , 2020, PLoS biology.

[19]  David R. Liu,et al.  Evaluation and Minimization of Cas9-Independent Off-Target DNA Editing by Cytosine Base Editors , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Hui Yang,et al.  Allele-specific genome editing of imprinting genes by preferentially targeting non-methylated loci using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9). , 2019, Science bulletin.

[21]  Shuo Li,et al.  Expanding C–T base editing toolkit with diversified cytidine deaminases , 2019, Nature Communications.

[22]  J. Rivest,et al.  Versatile and robust genome editing with Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR1-Cas9 , 2019, Genome research.

[23]  Hui Yang,et al.  Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis , 2019, Nature.

[24]  Qiang Sun,et al.  Developing ABEmax-NG with Precise Targeting and Expanded Editing Scope to Model Pathogenic Splice Site Mutations In Vivo , 2019, iScience.

[25]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors , 2019, Nature.

[26]  Tony P. Huang,et al.  Circularly permuted and PAM-modified Cas9 variants broaden the targeting scope of base editors , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Erik J Sontheimer,et al.  A Compact, High-Accuracy Cas9 with a Dinucleotide PAM for In Vivo Genome Editing. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[28]  Shisheng Huang,et al.  Base-Editing-Mediated R17H Substitution in Histone H3 Reveals Methylation-Dependent Regulation of Yap Signaling and Early Mouse Embryo Development. , 2019, Cell reports.

[29]  Lluis Montoliu,et al.  Genome Editing , 2018, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[30]  David R. Liu,et al.  Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  N. Mongan,et al.  Predicting puberty in partial androgen insensitivity syndrome: Use of clinical and functional androgen receptor indices , 2018, EBioMedicine.

[32]  Noah Jakimo,et al.  Minimal PAM specificity of a highly similar SpCas9 ortholog , 2018, Science Advances.

[33]  Nozomu Yachie,et al.  Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space , 2018, Science.

[34]  Li Yang,et al.  Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A-Cas9 fusion , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  Qiang Sun,et al.  Efficient generation of mouse models of human diseases via ABE- and BE-mediated base editing , 2018, Nature Communications.

[36]  David R. Liu,et al.  Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Li Yang,et al.  Base editing with a Cpf1–cytidine deaminase fusion , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[39]  David R. Liu,et al.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity , 2018, Nature.

[40]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity , 2017, Nature.

[41]  Kevin T. Zhao,et al.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity , 2017, Science Advances.

[42]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  David R. Liu,et al.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2016, Nature.

[45]  Yinqing Li,et al.  Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Cell.

[46]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities , 2015, Nature.

[47]  Brian C. Thomas,et al.  CRISPR Immunity Drives Rapid Phage Genome Evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus , 2015, mBio.

[48]  Yang Zhang,et al.  I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  Chase L. Beisel,et al.  Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[50]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature.

[52]  Prashant Mali,et al.  Orthogonal Cas9 Proteins for RNA-Guided Gene Regulation and Editing , 2013, Nature Methods.

[53]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[54]  Feng Zhang,et al.  CRISPR-assisted editing of bacterial genomes , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[56]  N. Navaratnam,et al.  An Overview of Cytidine Deaminases , 2006, International journal of hematology.

[57]  H. Klocker,et al.  Androgen receptor point mutations as the underlying molecular defect in 2 patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[58]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Efficient genome engineering in eukaryotes using Cas9 from Streptococcus thermophilus , 2014, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.