Interocular symmetry, intraobserver repeatability, and interobserver reliability of cone density measurements in the 13-lined ground squirrel

Background The 13-lined ground squirrel (13-LGS) possesses a cone-dominant retina that is highly amenable to non-invasive high-resolution retinal imaging. The ability for longitudinal assessment of a cone-dominant photoreceptor mosaic with an adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) has positioned the 13-LGS to become an accessible model for vision research. Here, we examine the interocular symmetry, repeatability, and reliability of cone density measurements in the 13-LGS. Methods Thirteen 13-LGS (18 eyes) were imaged along the vertical meridian with a custom AOSLO. Regions of interest were selected superior and inferior to the optic nerve head, including the cone-rich visual streak. Non-confocal split-detection was used to capture images of the cone mosaic. Five masked observers each manually identified photoreceptors for 26 images three times and corrected an algorithm’s cell identification outputs for all 214 images three times. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability of cone density were characterized using data collected from all five observers, while interocular symmetry was assessed in five animals using the average values of all observers. The distribution of image quality for all images in this study was assessed with open-sourced software. Results Manual identification was less repeatable than semi-automated correction for four of the five observers. Excellent repeatability was seen from all observers (ICC = 0.997–0.999), and there was good agreement between repeat cell identification corrections in all five observers (range: 9.43–25.71 cells/degree2). Reliability of cell identification was significantly different in two of the five observers, and worst in images taken from hibernating 13-LGS. Interocular symmetry of cone density was seen in the five 13-LGS assessed. Image quality was variable between blur- and pixel intensity-based metrics. Conclusions Interocular symmetry with repeatable cone density measurements suggest that the 13-LGS is well-suited for longitudinal examination of the cone mosaic using split-detection AOSLO. Differences in reliability highlight the importance of observer training and automation of AOSLO cell detection. Cone density measurements from hibernating 13-LGS are not repeatable. Additional studies are warranted to assess other metrics of cone health to detect deviations from normal 13-LGS in future models of cone disorder in this species.

[1]  Jianfei Liu,et al.  Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Garet P Lahvis,et al.  Current practices in a captive breeding colony of 13-lined ground squirrels (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus) , 2012, Lab Animal.

[3]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Measurement error proportional to the mean , 1996, BMJ.

[4]  David Williams,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[5]  Omer P. Kocaoglu,et al.  Phase-sensitive imaging of the outer retina using optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[6]  Á. Szél,et al.  Expression of phototransduction cascade genes in the ground squirrel retina. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  I T Young,et al.  A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms. , 1985, Cytometry.

[8]  Jessica C. Hsu,et al.  The Reliability of Cone Density Measurements in the Presence of Rods , 2018, Translational vision science & technology.

[9]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of the thirteen-lined ground squirrel photoreceptor mosaic , 2016, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  A. Dubra,et al.  Reliability and Repeatability of Cone Density Measurements in Patients With Stargardt Disease and RPGR-Associated Retinopathy , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[13]  Alfredo Dubra,et al.  Registration of 2D Images from Fast Scanning Ophthalmic Instruments , 2010, WBIR.

[14]  Ahmadreza Baghaie,et al.  An Automated Reference Frame Selection (ARFS) Algorithm for Cone Imaging with Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.

[15]  M. Huynen,et al.  The pros and cons of vertebrate animal models for functional and therapeutic research on inherited retinal dystrophies , 2015, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[16]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Theory of Optical Coherence Tomography , 2008 .

[17]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  In vivo imaging of human cone photoreceptor inner segments. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Repeatability of In Vivo Parafoveal Cone Density and Spacing Measurements , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  David H Brainard,et al.  Multi-modal automatic montaging of adaptive optics retinal images. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[20]  Anupam K. Garg,et al.  The reliability of parafoveal cone density measurements , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  Autofocusing for tissue microscopy , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  G H Jacobs,et al.  The topography of rod and cone photoreceptors in the retina of the ground squirrel , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  S. Fisher,et al.  The distributions of photoreceptors and ganglion cells in the California ground squirrel, Spermophilus beecheyi , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Deep learning based detection of cone photoreceptors with multimodal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images of achromatopsia. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[25]  S. Ourselin,et al.  Unsupervised identification of cone photoreceptors in non-confocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[26]  B. Jones,et al.  Seasonal and post-trauma remodeling in cone-dominant ground squirrel retina. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[27]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[28]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[29]  A. Roorda,et al.  Repeatability of Cone Spacing Measures in Eyes With Inherited Retinal Degenerations. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Light propagation and capture in cone photoreceptors. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[31]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Workflow and Metrics for Image Quality Control in Large-Scale High-Content Screens , 2012, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[32]  S. Tarima,et al.  Evaluating Descriptive Metrics of the Human Cone Mosaic , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  REPEATABILITY AND LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF FOVEAL CONE STRUCTURE IN CNGB3-ASSOCIATED ACHROMATOPSIA , 2017, Retina.

[34]  A. Roorda,et al.  Intrinsic signals from human cone photoreceptors. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Automatic detection of cone photoreceptors in split detector adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[36]  Madia C. Russillo,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Foveal Avascular Zone Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: Segmentation and Scaling , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.

[37]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[38]  A. Dubra,et al.  Evaluating seasonal changes of cone photoreceptor structure in the 13-lined ground squirrel , 2019, Vision Research.

[39]  Jennifer J. Hunter,et al.  Cellular-scale evaluation of induced photoreceptor degeneration in the living primate eye. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[40]  Sebastien Ourselin,et al.  Automatic Cone Photoreceptor Localisation in Healthy and Stargardt Afflicted Retinas Using Deep Learning , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[41]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Reliability and Repeatability of Cone Density Measurements in Patients with Congenital Achromatopsia. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  M. Wilk,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of In Vivo Cone Density Measurements in the Adult Zebrafish Retina. , 2018, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[43]  G. Luna,et al.  Assessment of Outer Retinal Remodeling in the Hibernating 13-Lined Ground Squirrel , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  Christine A. Curcio,et al.  The spatial resolution capacity of human foveal retina , 1989, Vision Research.