What governs the transition to a sustainable hydrogen economy? Articulating the relationship between technologies and political institutions

Abstract There is a lack of integrated knowledge on the transition to a sustainable energy system. The paper focuses on the relationship between technologies and institutions in the field of hydrogen from the perspective of political theory. The paper unfolds four paradigms of governance: ‘Governance by policy networking’, Governance by government’, ‘Governance by corporate business’, and ‘Governance by challenge’, and looks into the major line of argument in support of these paradigms and into their possible bias with respect to hydrogen options. Each of these paradigms reveals an institutional bias in that it articulates specific opportunities for collaboration and competition in order to stimulate the transition to a sustainable hydrogen economy. The paper makes the observation that there is a compelling need to reframe fashionable discourse such as the necessary shift from government to governance or from government to market. Instead, specific questions with respect to the impact of guiding policy frameworks on innovation will highlight that neither ‘neutral’ nor ‘optimal’ frameworks for policy making exist, where competing hydrogen options are at stake. The identification of paradigms of governance maybe considered a methodological device for (participator) policy analysis.

[1]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[2]  Joseph F. Coates Energy Needs, Choices, and Possibilities, Scenarios to 2050 , 2002 .

[3]  Arend Lijphart The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands , 1968 .

[4]  Esther Elisabeth Maria Luiten,et al.  Beyond energy efficiency : actors, networks and government intervention in the development of industrial process technologies , 2001 .

[5]  D. Price The Scientific Estate , 1966, Nature.

[6]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts , 2004 .

[7]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Climate OptiOns for the Long term (COOL): Stakeholders views on 80% emission reduction , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Mulder The Economics of Technology Diffusion and Energy Efficiency , 2005 .

[9]  Sandra Braman,et al.  The Policy Orientation , 2003 .

[10]  The Scientific Estate. , 1966 .

[11]  G. Teisman Sturen via creatieve concurrentie. Een innovatie-planologisch perspectief op ruimtelijke investeringsprojecten , 1997 .

[12]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .

[13]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy , 2011, Forerunners of Realizable Values Accounting in Financial Reporting.

[14]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[15]  Marleen van de Kerkhof,et al.  Shaping Diversity in Participatory Foresight Studies , 2002 .

[16]  B. Mintz,et al.  The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class. , 1986 .

[17]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[18]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[19]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[20]  A. Faaij,et al.  Global Warming and Social Innovation: The Challenge of a Climate Neutral Society , 2002 .

[21]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[22]  Arend Lijphart Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[23]  M. F. van de Kerkhof Debating Climate Change. A study of stakeholder participation in an integrated assessment of long-term climate policy in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[24]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[25]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[27]  Amory B. Lovins,et al.  A Strategy for the Hydrogen Transition , 1999 .

[28]  Jeremy Rifkin,et al.  The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the World-Wide Energy Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth , 2002 .

[29]  John Kenneth Galbraith,et al.  American Capitalism; The Concept of Countervailing Power , 1952 .

[30]  Y. Ezrahi,et al.  The descent of Icarus , 1990 .

[31]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  The Politics Of Accommodation , 1968 .

[32]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[33]  Michael Taylor,et al.  Community, anarchy, and liberty , 1982 .