A Review on User Interface Design Principles to Increase Software Usability for Users with Less Computer Literacy

This article presents a review on how software usab ility could be increased for users with less comput er literacy. The literature was reviewed to extract us er interface design principles by identifying the s imilar problems of this group of users. There are differen t groups of users with less computer literacy. Howe ver, based on the literature three groups of them need s pecial attention from software designers. The first group is elderly users, as users with lack of computer ba ckground. The second group is children, as novice u sers and the third group is users with mental or physica l disorders. Therefore, this study intends to focus on the mentioned groups, followed by a comparison between previous researches in the field, which reveals tha t some commonalities exist between the needs of these users. These commonalities were used to extract us er interface design principles such as (a) reducing th e number of features available at any given time, ( b) avoiding using computer terms, (c) putting customiz ation ability for font, color, size and (d) using appropriate graphical objects such as avatar or ico n. Taking these principles into account can solve s oftware usability problems and increase satisfaction of use rs with less computer literacy.

[1]  Markku Turunen,et al.  Accessible Multimodal Media Center Application for Blind and Partially Sighted People , 2010, CIE.

[2]  Jenny Chapman,et al.  Digital Multimedia , 2000 .

[3]  Mathilde M. Bekker,et al.  Developmentally situated design (DSD): making theoretical knowledge accessible to designers of children's technology , 2011, CHI.

[4]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Age-specific usability issues of software interfaces , 2009 .

[5]  Gail E. Kaiser,et al.  Computer and World Wide Web accessibility by visually disabled patients: problems and solutions , 2006 .

[6]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal accessibility in HCI: Process-oriented design guidelines and tool requirements , 1999 .

[7]  M. Rice,et al.  Low vision the visual interface for interactive television , 2004 .

[8]  Mark Rice,et al.  Low Vision and the Visual Interface for Interactive Television , 2004 .

[9]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  On the assessment of usability testing methods for children , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Designing the User Interface of an Interactive Software Environment for Children , 2000 .

[11]  Mark P. Wachowiak,et al.  Human-computer interface design in an e-Learning system for individuals with cognitive and learning disabilities , 2009, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Digital Information Management.

[12]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Introducing the Internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[13]  J. Munn Telling the Story , 2012, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[14]  Zhigang Fang,et al.  A structure for children-oriented Human Computer Interaction , 2011, The Fourth International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence.

[15]  A. Kavcic Software Accessibility: Recommendations and Guidelines , 2005, EUROCON 2005 - The International Conference on "Computer as a Tool".

[16]  Bo Xie,et al.  Older adults , computers , and the Internet : Future directions , 2004 .

[17]  Gill Whitney,et al.  HCI and the older population , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Stéphanie Giraud,et al.  Accessibility of rich internet applications for blind people: a study to identify the main problems and solutions , 2011, CHItaly.

[19]  Karuovic Dijana,et al.  Educational software adapted to children with disturbance of vision , 2010, IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics.

[20]  Joy Goodman-Deane,et al.  HCI and the older population , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[21]  Jean-Claude Martin,et al.  Multimedia interfaces for users with high functioning autism: An empirical investigation , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Rob Young Web Design , 2001 .

[23]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Beyond web content accessibility guidelines: Design of enhanced text user interfaces for blind internet users , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  G. Kaiser,et al.  Computer and World Wide Web accessibility by visually disabled patients: problems and solutions. , 2005, Survey of ophthalmology.

[25]  Josep Blat,et al.  Telling the story of older people e-mailing: An ethnographical study , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  M. Madiah,et al.  User-interface design: A case study of partially sighted children in Malaysia , 2010, 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr).

[27]  Kenneth C. Wilson,et al.  Friction of wave-induced sheet flow , 1989 .

[28]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Web accessibility design recommendations for people with cognitive disabilities , 2008 .

[29]  Gerrit C. van der Veer,et al.  Breaking Down Usability , 1999, INTERACT.

[30]  Jude T. Lubega,et al.  A web design framework for improved accessibility for people with disabilities (WDFAD) , 2008, W4A '08.

[31]  Afke Donker,et al.  Young children's ability to use a computer mouse , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[33]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[34]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Estimating coarse gene network structure from large-scale gene perturbation data. , 2002, Genome research.