A comparison of different depth ablations in the treatment of painful bullous keratopathy with phototherapeutic keratectomy

AIM To study the efficacy of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) for pain relief for patients with painful bullous keratopathy and poor visual potential. METHODS Patients with painful bullous keratopathy and poor visual potential were treated with superficial PTK (8–25 μm), intermediate (50–100 μm) or deep PTK (25% stromal thickness) using the Nidek EC5000 excimer laser after manual epithelial debridement. Follow up ranged from 1 to 24 months (mean 6.5 months). Outcome measures included symptomatic relief and need for further treatment. RESULTS In the superficial PTK group five of eight (62%) patients improved symptomatically after treatment. The three (38%) who did not improve went on to have penetrating keratoplasty for pain relief. In the intermediate depth group only two of five (40%) patients had symptom alleviation. The three others (60%) required further procedures. 20 of 24 (83%) patients treated with deep PTK had significant or total alleviation of symptoms. Of these, one developed acute anterior uveitis 9 months after PTK and two required botulinum ptosis for persistent corneal epithelial defects, one of whom had three consecutive episodes of microbial keratitis. Three of 24 suffered occasional discomfort and one patient required a penetrating keratoplasty for continued pain. CONCLUSION PTK can be a useful therapeutic measure in painful bullous keratopathy with poor visual potential. Deep PTK appears to be more successful in pain management than superficial treatment.

[1]  S. Tseng,et al.  Amniotic membrane transplantation for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  E. Cohen,et al.  Ulcerative keratitis in bullous keratopathy. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Guertin,et al.  Anterior stromal punctures for bullous keratopathy. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  I. Schipper,et al.  Phototherapeutic keratectomy for bullous keratopathy. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Jester,et al.  Anterior stromal puncture. Immunohistochemical studies in human corneas. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  N. Sundarraj,et al.  Corneal epithelial cell attachment with endogenous laminin and fibronectin. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  H. Kaufman SURGICAL APPROACHES TO CORNEAL WOUND HEALING , 1992, Acta ophthalmologica. Supplement.

[8]  D. Musch,et al.  Demographic and predisposing factors in corneal ulceration. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  R. Beuerman,et al.  Density and organization of free nerve endings in the corneal epithelium of the rabbit , 1982, Pain.

[10]  B. Weissman,et al.  Use of the Bausch & Lomb SoflensTM Plano T Contact Lens as a Bandage* , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  J. Draeger,et al.  [On the aesthesiometrie of the cornea (author's transl)]. , 1976, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[12]  M. Ruben Soft contact lens treatment of bullous keratopathy. , 1975, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[13]  D. Worthen,et al.  Histology of the Human Eye. , 1972 .

[14]  E. Cohen,et al.  Microbial keratitis and corneal ulceration associated with therapeutic soft contact lenses. , 1990, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[15]  D. S. Hull,et al.  Clinical experience with the therapeutic hydrophilic contact lens. , 1975, Annals of ophthalmology.

[16]  Hogan,et al.  Histology of the human eye;: An atlas and textbook , 1971 .