The cerebellum improves the precision of antisaccades by a latency-duration trade-off.

The cerebellum adapts motor responses by controlling the gain of a movement, preserving its accuracy and by learning from endpoint errors. Adaptive behavior likely acts not only in the motor but also in the sensory, behavioral, and cognitive domains, thus supporting a role of cerebellum in monitoring complex brain performances. Here, we analyzed the relationship between saccade latency, duration and endpoint error of antisaccades in a group of 10 idiopathic cerebellar atrophy (ICA) patients compared to controls. The latency distribution was decomposed in a decision time and a residual time. Both groups showed a trade-off between duration and decision time, with a peak of entropy within the range of this trade-off where the information flow was maximized. In cerebellar patients, greater reductions of duration as the time of decision increased, were associated with a lower probability for a saccade to fall near the target, with a constant low entropy outside the optimal time window. We suggest a modulation of saccade duration, depending on the latency-related decision time (accumulation of sensory and motor evidences in favor of a goal-directed movement), normally adopted to perform efficient trajectories in goal-directed saccades. This process is impaired in cerebellar patients suggesting a role for the cerebellum in monitoring voluntary motor performance by controlling the movement onset until the ambiguity of planning is resolved.

[1]  R. Baloh,et al.  Late-onset pure cerebellar ataxia: Differentiating those with and without identifiable mutations , 2005, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  Peter Thier,et al.  Cerebellar Complex Spike Firing Is Suitable to Induce as Well as to Stabilize Motor Learning , 2005, Current Biology.

[3]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[4]  P. Gomez,et al.  Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual-word recognition: A diffusion model analysis , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions , 1978, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Federico,et al.  Anti-Saccades in Cerebellar Ataxias Reveal a Contribution of the Cerebellum in Executive Functions , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[7]  A. Fuchs,et al.  The characteristics and neuronal substrate of saccadic eye movement plasticity , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm , 2003, Neuroreport.

[10]  Matthew R. G. Brown,et al.  Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related FMRI. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[12]  W. Schwarz The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  Catherine J. Stoodley The Cerebellum and Neurodevelopmental Disorders , 2015, The Cerebellum.

[15]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. , 2010, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[16]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Munoz,et al.  Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Siti Anom Ahmad,et al.  Moving approximate entropy applied to surface electromyographic signals , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[20]  L. Optican,et al.  The role of dentate nuclei in human oculomotor control: insights from cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30 , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[22]  Vassilis Cutsuridis,et al.  Antisaccade performance in schizophrenia: a neural model of decision making in the superior colliculus , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  Vassilis Cutsuridis,et al.  Neural accumulator models of decision making in eye movements. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[24]  P. Thier,et al.  Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  C. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex , 2004, Current opinion in neurology.

[27]  S. Hutton Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  Rate Coding Versus Temporal Order Coding: What the Retinal Ganglion Cells Tell the Visual Cortex , 2001, Neural Computation.

[29]  Imran Noorani,et al.  LATER models of neural decision behavior in choice tasks , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[30]  A L Goldberger,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[31]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Control of Saccades in Humans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Yoshiko Kojima,et al.  Changes in Simple Spike Activity of Some Purkinje Cells in the Oculomotor Vermis during Saccade Adaptation Are Appropriate to Participate in Motor Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  A model of time estimation and error feedback in predictive timing behavior , 2008, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[35]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[36]  Pamela Federighi,et al.  Differences in saccade dynamics between spinocerebellar ataxia 2 and late-onset cerebellar ataxias. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  Stavros J. Perantonis,et al.  A neural model of decision-making by the superior colicullus in an antisaccade task , 2007, Neural Networks.

[38]  Wilsaan M. Joiner,et al.  Adaptive Control of Saccades via Internal Feedback , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Antisaccades as decisions: LATER model predicts latency distributions and error responses , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  D P Munoz,et al.  Neuronal Correlates for Preparatory Set Associated with Pro-Saccades and Anti-Saccades in the Primate Frontal Eye Field , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.