Registering large caustic distortions for high dynamic range diffuser wavefront sensing

Wavefront sensing is typically accomplished with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS), where a CCD or CMOS is placed at the focal plane of a periodic, microfabricated lenslet array. Tracking the displacement of the resulting spots in the presence of an aberrated wavefront yields measurement of the relative wavefront introduced. A SHWS has a fundamental tradeoff between sensitivity and range, determined by the pitch and focal length of its lenslet array, such that the number of resolvable tilts is a constant. Recently, diffuser wavefront sensing (DWS) has been demonstrated by measuring the lateral shift of a coherent speckle pattern using the concept of the diffuser memory effect. Here we demonstrate that tracking distortions of the non-periodic caustic pattern produced by a holographic diffuser allows accurate autorefraction of a model eye with a number of resolvable tilts that extends beyond the fundamental limit of a SHWS. Using a multi-level Demon’s image registration algorithm, we are able to demonstrate that a DWS demonstrates a 2.5x increase in number of resolvable prescriptions as compared to a conventional SHWS while maintaining acceptable accuracy and repeatability for eyeglass prescriptions. We evaluate the performance of a DWS and SHWS in parallel with a coherent laser diode without (LD) and with a laser speckle reducer (LD+LSR), and an incoherent light-emitting diode (LED), demonstrating caustic-tracking is compatible with coherent and incoherent sources. Additionally, the DWS diffuser costs 40x less than a SHWS lenslet array, enabling affordable large-dynamic range autorefraction without moving parts.

[1]  Susana Marcos,et al.  From unseen to seen: tackling the global burden of uncorrected refractive errors. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Guang-ming Dai,et al.  Wavefront Optics for Vision Correction , 2008 .

[3]  Li Xuan,et al.  Novel methods to improve the measurement accuracy and the dynamic range of Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2014 .

[4]  Hervé Rigneault,et al.  Wavefront sensing with a thin diffuser. , 2017, Optics letters.

[5]  Gregory N. McKay,et al.  Large dynamic range autorefraction with a low-cost diffuser wavefront sensor. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[6]  R. Shack,et al.  History and principles of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  Takanori Nomura,et al.  Holographic Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor based on the correlation peak displacement detection method for wavefront sensing with large dynamic range , 2015 .

[8]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor , 2015, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  C Dainty,et al.  A simple and robust method to extend the dynamic range of an aberrometer. , 2009, Optics express.

[10]  J. Schwider,et al.  Dynamic range expansion of a Shack-Hartmann sensor by use of a modified unwrapping algorithm. , 1998, Optics letters.

[11]  Colin Fowler,et al.  Field Guide to Visual and Ophthalmic Optics , 2005 .

[12]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..