A double-blind placebo-controlled study of botulinum toxin in upper limb spasticity after stroke or head injury

Objective: To assess dose–response relationships to a single dose of botulinum toxin ‘A’ in upper limb spasticity associated with stroke or head injury. Design: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized dose ranging study. Setting: A regional centre for neuroscience and a neurorehabilitation outpatient clinic. Subjects: Twenty-one hemiplegic patients with troublesome upper limb spasticity. Nineteen with stroke and two with head injury. Main outcome measures: Spasticity (modified Ashworth), range of movement, posture (postural alignment and finger curl), disability (upper body dressing time and Frenchay Arm Test), patient-reported global assessment scale. Results: Combining data from all doses of botulinum toxin there was a significant reduction in spasticity at the wrist and fingers associated with a greater range of passive movement at the wrist and less finger curl at rest. There was a tendency for a further reduction in spasticity at elbow and wrist to occur with increasing dose but not for finger spasticity or curl. Effects present at six weeks were lost by 12 weeks except for a small improvement in elbow range of movement at the 1500 Mu dose. There was no change in upper limb disability but a significant increase in patients' global assessment of benefit. Conclusion: Botulinum toxin produced beneficial effects in spasticity and passive range of movement in the hemiplegic upper limb. Increasing the dose increased the magnitude of response for impairments in some muscle groups but had little effect on duration of response.

[1]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait Assessment for Neurologically Impaired Patients , 1986 .

[2]  A. Thilmann,et al.  Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[3]  J. Ferro,et al.  Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of arm and hand spasticity in stroke patients , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  M. Keenan,et al.  Percutaneous phenol block of the musculocutaneous nerve to control elbow flexor spasticity. , 1990, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  S. Hesse,et al.  Botulinum toxin type A and short-term electrical stimulation in the treatment of upper limb flexor spasticity after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[6]  D. Tarsy,et al.  Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of spasticity: functional implications and patient selection. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[8]  R L Hewer,et al.  Assessment of recovery of arm control in hemiplegic stroke patients. 1. Arm function tests. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  D. Haran,et al.  The Reliability of Measurement of Postural Alignment to Assess Muscle Tone Change , 1995 .

[10]  D. M. Simpson,et al.  Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of upper extremity spasticity , 1996, Neurology.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. , 1992, BMJ.

[13]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[14]  B. Bhakta,et al.  Use of botulinum toxin in stroke patients with severe upper limb spasticity. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  D. Garland,et al.  Percutaneous phenol blocks to motor points of spastic forearm muscles in head-injured adults. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .