Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans

To investigate whether processing underlying texture segmentation is limited when texture is not attended, we measured orientation discrimination accuracy and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) while a texture bar was cyclically alternated with a uniform texture, either attended or not. Orientation discrimination was maximum when the bar was explicitly attended, above threshold when implicitly attended, and fell to just chance when unattended, suggesting that orientation discrimination based on grouping of elements along texture boundary requires explicit attention. We analyzed tsVEPs (variations in VEP amplitude obtained by algebraic subtraction of uniform-texture from segmented-texture VEPs) elicited by the texture boundary orientation discrimination task. When texture was unattended, tsVEPs still reflected local texture segregation. We found larger amplitudes of early tsVEP components (N75, P100, N150, N200) when texture boundary was parallel to texture elements, indicating a saliency effect, perhaps at V1 level. This effect was modulated by attention, disappearing when the texture was not attended, a result indicating that attention facilitates grouping by collinearity in the direction of the texture boundary.

[1]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[2]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments , 1992, Vision Research.

[3]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Interactions between attention, context and learning in primary visual cortex , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Sagi,et al.  Texture-Based Tasks are Little Affected by Second Tasks Requiring Peripheral or Central Attentive Fixation , 1991, Perception.

[5]  J. Beck.  Perceptual grouping produced by line figures , 1967 .

[6]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Michael Bach,et al.  Summation of texture segregation across orientation and spatial frequency: electrophysiological and psychophysical findings , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention and Perceptual Learning Modulate Contextual Influences on Visual Perception , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  A Theory of Textural Segmentation , 1983 .

[11]  H. Nothdurft.  Attention shifts to salient targets , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[13]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[14]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Neural mechanisms of perceptual grouping in humans as revealed by high density event related potentials , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Visual effects of lesions of cortical area V2 in macaques , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  I. Rock,et al.  Perception without attention: Results of a new method , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  C Meinecke,et al.  Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Perceptual learning modulates electrophysiological and psychophysical response to visual texture segmentation in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  B. Motter.  Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  M Fahle,et al.  Feature-specific electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation , 2003, Vision Research.

[24]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of lateral interactions in human visual cortex , 2004, Vision Research.

[25]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  H. Nothdurft.  Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation , 1985, Vision Research.

[27]  D. Sagi,et al.  Vision outside the focus of attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[30]  H. Keselman,et al.  The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. , 2001, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[31]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[32]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[35]  Victor A. F. Lamme.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  Y. Ejima.  Differential Contribution of Early Visual Areas to Perception of Contextual Effects: fMRI Studies , 2007 .

[37]  Michael Bach,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential , 1992, Vision Research.

[38]  M Bach,et al.  Perceptual ranking versus visual evoked potentials for different local features in texture segregation. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Clara Casco,et al.  A visual evoked potential correlate of global figure-ground segmentation , 1999, Vision Research.

[41]  B. Julesz,et al.  Texton gradients: The texton theory revisited , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[42]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Human and Machine Vision , 1983 .

[43]  J. Beck,et al.  The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity , 1973 .

[44]  D. Mumford,et al.  The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[45]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[46]  M. Bach,et al.  Similar Electrophysiological Correlates of Texture Segregation Induced by Luminance, Orientation, Motion and Stereo , 1997, Vision Research.

[47]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[48]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.