Optimal Information Asymmetry

At the heart of decentralization lies the notion that tasks are delegated by owners to managers who possess superior local information. The extent of this information asymmetry is often an endogenous construct, as it is influenced by the owner's choice of internal accounting systems and the manager's investment in acquiring local expertise. In this paper, we explore how varying levels of pre‐contract, asymmetric information affect the owner‐manager relationship. We provide three main sets of insights. First, we find that the owner's payoffs are initially decreasing, and strictly convex everywhere, in the quality of the manager's private information. The owner thus prefers to deal with either a perfectly informed or a perfectly uninformed manager, and we characterize conditions for either to be the preferred choice. Second, in contrast to recent work, we demonstrate that when information can be communicated internally, the optimal strength of managerial incentives unambiguously decreases as the manager bec...

[1]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[2]  Rick Antle,et al.  Information Rents and Preferences among Information Systems in a Model of Resource Allocation , 1995 .

[3]  Joel Sobel,et al.  Information Control in the Principal-Agent Problem , 1993 .

[4]  Stefan Reichelstein Constructing incentive schemes for government contracts : an application of agency theory , 1992 .

[5]  George P. Baker,et al.  Volatility, Noise, and Incentives , 2003 .

[6]  Mark Penno,et al.  Asymmetry Of Pre-Decision Information And Managerial Accounting , 1984 .

[7]  Michael Raith,et al.  Specific Knowledge and Performance Measurement , 2004 .

[8]  D. Blackwell Comparison of Experiments , 1951 .

[9]  The One Who Controls the Information Appropriates Its Rents , 2003 .

[10]  Tracy R. Lewis,et al.  Ignorance in Agency Problems , 1993 .

[11]  W. Rogerson On the Optimality of Menus of Linear Contracts , 1987 .

[12]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Strategic Information Gathering Before a Contract is Offered , 1998 .

[13]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Participation, Slack, and Budget-Based Performance Evaluation , 1991 .

[14]  Stanley Baiman,et al.  PRE-DECISION INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[15]  Anke S. Kessler The Value of Ignorance , 1998 .

[16]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Balancing Performance Measures , 2001 .

[17]  E. Maskin,et al.  Monopoly with Incomplete Information , 1984 .

[18]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[19]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[20]  Jacques Crémer,et al.  Gathering Information before Signing a Contract , 1991 .

[21]  John Christensen,et al.  Communication in Agencies , 1981 .

[22]  David E. M. Sappington,et al.  Incentive contracting with asymmetric and imperfect precontractual knowledge , 1984 .

[23]  Nahum D. Melumad Asymmetric information and the termination of contracts in agencies , 1989 .

[24]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[25]  A note on the value of information given asymmetric information and self-reporting* , 1987 .

[26]  Mark Penno,et al.  Private Predecision Information, Performance Measure Congruity, and the Value of Delegation* , 2000 .

[27]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Tracy R. Lewis,et al.  All-or-nothing information control , 1991 .

[29]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Does empowerment lead to higher quality and profitability , 1998 .

[30]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Log-concave probability and its applications , 2004 .