Variations in the length of stay of intensive care unit nonsurvivors in three scandinavian countries

IntroductionThe length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) nonsurvivors is not often reported, but represents an important indicator of the use of resources. LOS in ICU nonsurvivors may also be a marker of cultural and organizational differences between units. In this study based on the national intensive care registries in Finland, Sweden, and Norway, we aimed to report intensive care mortality and to document resource use as measured by LOS in ICU nonsurvivors.MethodsRegistry data from 53,305 ICU patients in 2006 were merged into a single database. ICU nonsurvivors were analyzed with regard to LOS within subgroups by univariate and multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards regression).ResultsVital status at ICU discharge was available for 52,255 patients. Overall ICU mortality was 9.1%. Median LOS of the nonsurvivors was 1.3 days in Finland and Sweden, and 1.9 days in Norway. The shortest LOS of the nonsurvivors was found in patients older than 80 years, emergency medical admissions, and the patients with the highest severity of illness. Multivariate analysis confirmed the longer LOS in Norway when corrected for age group, admission category, sex, and type of hospital. LOS in nonsurvivors was found to be inversely related to the severity of illness, as measured by APACHE II and SAPS II.ConclusionsDespite cultural, religious, and educational similarities, significant variations occur in the LOS of ICU nonsurvivors among Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Overall, ICU mortality is low in the Scandinavian countries.

[1]  C. Sprung,et al.  The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  Anthony Delaney,et al.  Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre cohort analysis , 2009, Critical care.

[3]  Graeme K Hart,et al.  Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993–2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[4]  J. Norrie,et al.  Evaluation of predicted and actual length of stay in 22 Scottish intensive care units using the APACHE III system , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[5]  Charles L Sprung,et al.  End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  M. Suistomaa,et al.  Sampling rate causes bias in APACHE II and SAPS II scores , 2000, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  G. Rubenfeld,et al.  Transferring critically ill patients out of hospital improves the standardized mortality ratio: a simulation study. , 2007, Chest.

[8]  B. Lo,et al.  Who Should Receive Life Support During a Public Health Emergency? Using Ethical Principles to Improve Allocation Decisions , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  R. Moreno,et al.  Nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS) , 1997, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  G Bertolini,et al.  Continuous quality improvement in intensive care medicine. The GiViTI Margherita Project - Report 2005. , 2006, Minerva anestesiologica.

[11]  D. Cullen,et al.  Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: Update 1983 , 1983, Critical care medicine.

[12]  Eduard E Vasilevskis,et al.  Mortality probability model III and simplified acute physiology score II: assessing their value in predicting length of stay and comparison to APACHE IV. , 2009, Chest.

[13]  H. Wunsch,et al.  Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[14]  A. Abu-Hanna,et al.  Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[15]  Minna Niskanen,et al.  Case-mix-adjusted length of stay and mortality in 23 Finnish ICUs , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.