Methodology for exploiting potentials of remanufacturing by reducing complexity for original equipment manufacturers

Abstract Despite significant advantages from manufacturer, consumer and societal perspectives, the share of remanufactured products is still low in most industries. Commitment of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) is limited due to the manifold barriers and challenges that were hitherto unknown in the traditional production environment. Based on the Business Model Canvas, a methodology identifying feasible options for competitive remanufacturing by evaluating case-specific barriers and challenges in order to cope with the corresponding complexity has been developed. Product-service systems are systematically utilized to exploit the potentials of remanufacturing. The methodology is demonstrated for OEM-oriented remanufacturing in medical technology, specifically an insulin pump.

[1]  G. Seliger,et al.  Emerging Markets bei Materiellen Grenzen des Wachstums — Chancen nachhaltiger Wertschöpfung , 2011 .

[2]  V. Guide Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs , 2000 .

[3]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Re-engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability , 2013 .

[4]  Jay Lee,et al.  Maintenance: Changing role in life cycle management , 2004 .

[5]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Sustainability in manufacturing: Recovery of resources in product and material cycles , 2007 .

[6]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Living planet report 2012 , 2012 .

[7]  M. Makary,et al.  Commentary: A Call to Go Green in Health Care by Reprocessing Medical Equipment , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  A. Tukker Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet , 2004 .

[9]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  A comparison of manufacturing and remanufacturing energy intensities with application to diesel engine production , 2008 .

[10]  Peggy Zwolinski,et al.  Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[11]  Michael Haumann Variantenmanagement in der Refabrikation , 2011 .

[12]  T. Sloan Safety-cost trade-offs in medical device reuse: a Markov decision process model , 2007, Health care management science.

[13]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[14]  László Monostori,et al.  Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing , 2012 .

[15]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[16]  K. Peattie,et al.  Meeting the Closed-Loop Challenge: The Case of Remanufacturing , 2004 .

[17]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[19]  Erik Sundin,et al.  Product and Process Design for Successful Remanufacturing , 2004 .

[20]  Anton Ovchinnikov,et al.  Revenue and Cost Management for Remanufactured Products , 2011 .

[21]  Martin Charter,et al.  Remanufacturing and product design , 2008 .

[22]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  So What If Remanufacturing Cannibalizes My New Product Sales? , 2010 .

[23]  Gilvan C. Souza Production Planning and Control for Remanufacturing , 2010 .