Processes affecting concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the UK atmosphere

PM2.5 is now subject to a limit value and exposure-reduction targets across the European Union. This has led to a rapid expansion in PM2.5 monitoring across Europe and this paper reviews data collected in the United Kingdom in 2009. The expected gradient between rural, urban background and roadside sites is observed, although the roadside increment is generally rather small except for heavily trafficked street canyon locations. PM2.5:PM10 ratios decline from around 0.8 in southeast England to below 0.6 in Scotland consistent with a higher contribution of secondary particulate matter in southeast England. Average diurnal profiles of PM2.5 differ around the UK but have a common feature in a nocturnal minimum and a peak during the morning rush hour. Central and southern UK sites also show an evening peak following a concentration reduction during the mid afternoon which is not seen at northern UK sites and is attributed to evaporation of semi-volatile components, particularly ammonium nitrate. Concentrations of PM2.5 are typically highest in the winter months and lowest in the mid-summer consistent with better mixing and volatilisation of semi-volatile components in the warmer months of the year. Directional analysis shows a stronger association of PM2.5 with easterly winds associated with air masses from the European mainland than with the direction of local traffic sources.

[1]  Harald Flentje,et al.  A European aerosol phenomenology 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe , 2010 .

[2]  R. Harrison,et al.  Field measurements of the dissociation of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride aerosols , 1989 .

[3]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Estimation of the emission factors of particle number and mass fractions from traffic at a site where mean vehicle speeds vary over short distances , 2006 .

[4]  Timothy Baker,et al.  Development and validation of the volatile correction model for PM10 -An empirical method for adjusting TEOM measurements for their loss of volatile particulate matter , 2009 .

[5]  K. Demerjian,et al.  Multi-year urban and rural semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate and nitrate measurements in New York state: Evaluation and comparison with filter based measurements , 2006 .

[6]  R. Barry,et al.  Atmosphere, Weather and Climate , 1968 .

[7]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Analysis of the air pollution climate at a central urban background site , 2010 .

[8]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Properties of coarse particles in the atmosphere of the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[9]  M. Facchini,et al.  Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition over the Italian Peninsula during typical summer and winter conditions , 2010 .

[10]  H. Hansson,et al.  Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in selected European cities , 2004 .

[11]  A. Bigi,et al.  Particle Number Size Distribution and Weight Concentration of Background Urban Aerosol in a Po Valley Site , 2011 .

[12]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  R. Harrison,et al.  PMF analysis of wide-range particle size spectra collected on a major highway. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  E. T. Hayes,et al.  An independent review of monitoring measures undertaken in Neath Port Talbot in respect of particulate matter (PM10) , 2009 .

[15]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  A Study of the Size Distributions and the Chemical Characterization of Airborne Particles in the Vicinity of a Large Integrated Steelworks , 2008 .

[16]  R. Harrison,et al.  Sources and processes affecting carbonaceous aerosol in central England , 2008 .

[17]  Roy M Harrison,et al.  Fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM2.5-10) particulate matter on a heavily trafficked London highway: sources and processes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.