Molecular properties of WHO essential drugs and provisional biopharmaceutical classification.

The purpose of this study is to provisionally classify, based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), drugs in immediate-release dosage forms that appear on the World Health Organization (WHO) Essential Drug List. The classification in this report is based on the aqueous solubility of the drugs reported in commonly available reference literature and a correlation of human intestinal membrane permeability for a set of 29 reference drugs with their calculated partition coefficients. The WHO Essential Drug List consists of a total of 325 medicines and 260 drugs, of which 123 are oral drugs in immediate-release (IR) products. Drugs with dose numbers less than or equal to unity [Do = (maximum dose strength/250 mL)/solubility < or = 1] are defined as high-solubility drugs. Drug solubility for the uncharged, lowest-solubility form reported in the Merck Index or USP was used. Of the 123 WHO oral drugs in immediate-release dosage forms, 67% (82) were determined to be high-solubility drugs. The classification of permeability is based on correlations of human intestinal permeability of 29 reference drugs with the estimated log P or CLogP lipophilicity values. Metoprolol was chosen as the reference compound for permeability and log P or CLogP. Log P and CLogP were linearly correlated (r2 = 0.78) for 104 drugs. A total of 53 (43.1%) and 62 (50.4%) drugs on the WHO list exhibited log P and CLogP estimates, respectively, that were greater than or equal to the corresponding metoprolol value and are classified as high-permeability drugs. The percentages of the drugs in immediate-release dosage forms that were classified as BCS Class 1, Class 2, Class 3, and Class 4 drugs using dose number and log Pwere as follows: 23.6% in Class 1, 17.1% in Class 2, 31.7% in Class 3, and 10.6% in Class 4. The remaining 17.1% of the drugs could not be classified because of the inability to calculate log P values because of missing fragments. The corresponding percentages in the various BCS classes with dose number and CLogP criteria were similar: 28.5% in Class 1, 19.5% in Class 2, 35.0% in Class 3, and 9.8% in Class 4. The remaining 7.3% of the drugs could not be classified since CLogP could not be calculated. These results suggest that a satisfactory bioequivalence (BE) test for more than 55% of the high-solubility Class 1 and Class 3 drug products on the WHO Essential Drug List may be based on an in vitro dissolution test. The use of more easily implemented, routinely monitored, and reliable in vitro dissolution tests can ensure the clinical performance of drug products that appear on the WHO Essential Medicines List.

[1]  A. Leo,et al.  Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology , 1979 .

[2]  P. Broto,et al.  Molecular structures: perception, autocorrelation descriptor and sar studies. Perception of molecules: topological structure and 3-dimensional structure , 1984 .

[3]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional-structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 2. Modeling dispersive and hydrophobic interactions , 1987, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[5]  H Lennernäs,et al.  Correlation of human jejunal permeability (in vivo) of drugs with experimentally and theoretically derived parameters. A multivariate data analysis approach. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  B. Schug,et al.  The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): class III drugs - better candidates for BA/BE waiver? , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[7]  P. Morsing,et al.  Mechanistic differences of various AT1-receptor blockers in isolated vessels of different origin. , 1999, Hypertension.

[8]  U. Christians,et al.  Active transport of the angiotensin‐II antagonist losartan and its main metabolite EXP 3174 across MDCK‐MDR1 and Caco‐2 cell monolayers , 2000, British journal of pharmacology.

[9]  Anders Karlén,et al.  Hydrogen bonding descriptors in the prediction of human in vivo intestinal permeability. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[10]  S. Yalkowsky,et al.  Handbook of aqueous solubility data , 2003 .

[11]  Christos Reppas,et al.  Dissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Immediate Release Dosage Forms , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[12]  Gordon L. Amidon,et al.  Estimating the Fraction Dose Absorbed from Suspensions of Poorly Soluble Compounds in Humans: A Mathematical Model , 1993, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  J. Crison,et al.  A Theoretical Basis for a Biopharmaceutic Drug Classification: The Correlation of in Vitro Drug Product Dissolution and in Vivo Bioavailability , 1995, Pharmaceutical Research.

[14]  Vinod P. Shah,et al.  Biopharmaceutics Classification System: The Scientific Basis for Biowaiver Extensions , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[15]  R. Löbenberg,et al.  Evaluation of Various Dissolution Media for Predicting In Vivo Performance of Class I and II Drugs , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.