Political Institutions and Income Inequality: The Case of Decentralization

Political power is being reallocated across territorial boundaries. Traditionally centralized polities are either decentralized or on their way to decentralization. In addition, European nations are engaged in the process of building a common set of rules both respectful to and compatible with their own peculiarities. As a result, the number of political entities in which several levels of government share a common economic space has increased. This paper analyzes how decentralization interacts with the politics of redistribution and inequality. The argument can be outlined as follows. Contrary to what is conventionally argued, decentralization per se does not necessarily lead towards higher (or lower) levels of income inequality. Whatever the impact of decentralization on the distribution of income may be, it is to a large extent a function of the internal structures of inequality within regions and their combination. Secondly, if decentralization indeed leads to different distributive outcomes, there are reasons to believe that, in the context of multilevel governance, contentions about the institutional design of redistribution are themselves contentions about who gets what. Such contentions make decentralization endogenous to the territorial structure of inequality by virtue of a political process linking the latter to the preferences about the institutional design of redistribution. The first part of the paper formalizes this argument. The second one tests its main implications against a data set of 15 OECD countries over the period 1980- 1997.

[1]  S. Rose-Ackerman Does Federalism Matter? Political Choice in a Federal Republic , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Ugo Panizza,et al.  On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence , 1997 .

[3]  Horst Albach,et al.  Information gathering and dissemination : the contribution of JETRO to Japanese competitiveness , 1997 .

[4]  Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Essays on the Contribution of Public Infrastructure to Private Production and its Political Economy , 2001 .

[5]  W. Oates,et al.  Decentralization in the Public Sector: An Empirical Study of State and Local Government , 1988 .

[6]  Silke Neubauer,et al.  Multimarket contact and organizational design , 2001 .

[7]  J. Lane,et al.  The New Institutional Politics: Performance and outcomes , 2000 .

[8]  P. Pierson The New Politics of the Welfare State , 1996, World Politics.

[9]  F. Bourguignon On the Measurement of Inequality , 2003 .

[10]  Evelyne Huber,et al.  Comparative Welfare States Data Set , 2004 .

[11]  H. Albach,et al.  Information processing as a competitive advantage of Japanese firms , 1999 .

[12]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[13]  D. Wildasin Factor Mobility, Risk and Redistribution in the Welfare State , 1995 .

[14]  M. Wallerstein Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies , 1999 .

[15]  Manfred Fleischer,et al.  The inefficiency trap: strategy failure in the German machine tool industry , 1997 .

[16]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Redistribution , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  P. Bolton,et al.  Distributional Conflicts, Factor Mobility, and Political Integration , 1996 .

[18]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Income Redistribution in an Economic Union: The Trade Off Between Inter- and Intra-National Redistribution , 1997 .

[19]  J. Linz Democracy, Multinationalism And Federalism , 1997 .

[20]  G. Garrett,et al.  GLOBALIZATION AND FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION , 2021, Governance in a Global Economy.

[21]  D. Neven,et al.  The political economy of industrial policy in Europe and the member states , 2000 .

[22]  Thomas R. Cusack Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989 , 1997 .

[23]  F. Castles,et al.  Left Right Political Scales - Some Expert Judgments , 1984 .

[24]  Kevin Roberts,et al.  Voting over income tax schedules , 1977 .

[25]  Horst Albach,et al.  Bankbeziehungen deutscher Unternehmen : Investitionsverhalten und Risikoanalyse , 2000 .

[26]  D. Elazar Federal Systems Of The World , 1994 .

[27]  Robin Boadway The imperative of fiscal sharing transfers , 2002 .

[28]  Kenneth R. Mayer,et al.  The Price for Federalism , 1995 .

[29]  R. Prud’homme The dangers of decentralization , 1995 .

[30]  P. Peterson,et al.  Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard , 1990 .

[31]  Herrn Diplom-VolkswirtChristophSchenk Cooperation between Competitors - Subcontracting and the influence of information, production and capacity on market structure and competition , 1999 .

[32]  Isabela Mares Firms and the Welfare State: When, Why, and How Does Social Policy Matter to Employers? , 2001 .

[33]  D. Soskice,et al.  An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Enrico Spolaore,et al.  Economic theories of the break-up and integration of nations , 1996 .

[35]  H. Varian Redistributive taxation as social insurance , 1980 .

[36]  Patrick Bolton,et al.  The Breakup of Nations: A Political Econ-omy Analysis , 1997 .

[37]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  The "Uncorrelated Errors" Approach to the Problem of Causal Feedback , 1982, The Journal of Politics.

[38]  Torben Iversen,et al.  Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state , 2001 .

[39]  J. Visser European trade unions in figures , 1989 .

[40]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. , 1996 .

[41]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard , 1996 .

[42]  Ralph Siebert,et al.  Innovation, research joint ventures, and multiproduct competition , 2000 .

[43]  Alexander Hicks,et al.  Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. By Evelyne Huber and John D. Stephens. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. 368p. $54.00 cloth, $18.00 paper. , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[44]  Andreas Moerke Organisationslernen über Netzwerke : die personellen Verflechtungen von Führungsgremien japanischer Aktiengesellschaften , 2001 .

[45]  P. Pierson,et al.  "The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, Deindustrialization and Partisan Politics" , 2001 .

[46]  Jonas Pontusson,et al.  Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism , 2000, World Politics.

[47]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy , 2000 .

[48]  Allan H. Meltzer,et al.  A Rational Theory of the Size of Government , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[49]  Hans-Werner Sinn,et al.  A Theory of the Welfare State , 1994 .

[50]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Does centralization increase the size of government , 1994 .

[51]  Thomas Romer,et al.  Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax , 1975 .

[52]  W. Oates,et al.  An Essay on Fiscal Federalism , 1999 .