Comparison of penile prosthesis methods: Which is more successful?

1 Selçuk Esengen1, İsmail Nalbant2, Ufuk Öztürk3, Can Tuygun3, Serkan Yıldız4, Musa Ekici5, Muhammed Abdurrahim İmamoğlu6 1Polatlı Devlet Hastanesi, Ankara, 2Ordu Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ordu, 3Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, 4Siirt Devlet Hastanesi, Siirt, 5Hitit Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çorum, 6Bozok Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Yozgat, Türkiye Comparison of Penile Prosthesis Methods Comparison of Penile Prosthesis Methods: Which is More Successful?

[1]  Yurdaer Kaynak,et al.  Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses. , 2014, Turkish journal of urology.

[2]  S. L. Marco,et al.  Penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction, use and preference for malleable vs inflatable , 2014 .

[3]  O. Canguven,et al.  Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. , 2013, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica.

[4]  M. Srougi,et al.  Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America. , 2010, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[5]  P. Ditonno,et al.  Penile prostheses , 2010, Therapeutic advances in urology.

[6]  A. Natali,et al.  Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. , 2008, The journal of sexual medicine.

[7]  D. Montague,et al.  Penile prosthesis implantation: past, present and future , 2008, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[8]  R. Shamloul,et al.  Experience with Tube® (Promedon) Malleable Penile Implant , 2007, Urologia Internationalis.

[9]  A. Minervini,et al.  Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures , 2006, BJU international.

[10]  N. Salama.  Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East: is it different from that reported elsewhere? , 2004, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[11]  J. Mulhall,et al.  Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[12]  L. Levine,et al.  Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[13]  A. Burnett,et al.  EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. , 1999, Urology.

[14]  A. Jalal,et al.  Penile Prosthesis Implantation for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction , 2009 .

[15]  M. Lux,et al.  Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[16]  F. Montorsi,et al.  European Association of Urology GUIDELINES ON ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION , 2004 .