Compact Configuration of Aircraft Flows at Intersections

This paper proposes a compact configuration of aircraft flows at intersections. The goal is to achieve a higher capacity of the airspace, allowing more aircraft to safely fly through a fixed region. Intersections of aircraft flows can be considered as basic building blocks for air traffic networks, and traffic networks can be designed through finding optimal arrangements of intersections whose conflict zones do not overlap. A conflict zone is defined as a minimal circular area centered at the intersection of two flows, which allows aircraft approaching the intersections to resolve conflict completely within the conflict zone. This paper derives the relationship between the size of a conflict zone and the intersection angle of the two flows. Such a relationship guides the choice of the most compact configuration for intersecting aircraft flows. An example involving multiple converging flows of aircraft demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed configuration of intersections. The result of conflict resolution shows a greatly reduced traffic complexity. Therefore, our study provides a potential solution to increase airspace capacity.

[1]  Kyle Treleaven,et al.  Conflict Resolution and Traffic Complexity of Multiple Intersecting Flows of Aircraft , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Xavier Prats,et al.  Effect of Wind on Operating-Cost-Based Cruise Speed Reduction for Delay Absorption , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Structural considerations and cognitive complexity in air traffic control , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[4]  S. Puechmorel,et al.  Air Traffic Complexity: Towards an Intrinsic Metric , 2000 .

[5]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Automation in Future Air Traffic Management: Effects of Decision Aid Reliability on Controller Performance and Mental Workload , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability of intersecting aircraft flows using heading-change maneuvers for conflict avoidance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[8]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Deconstructing Complexity in Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Decentralized Cooperative Policy for Conflict Resolution in Multivehicle Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[10]  Jing Xing,et al.  Complexity and Automation Displays of Air Traffic Control Literature: Review and Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  D. Iamratanakul,et al.  Quantification of airspace sector capacity using decentralized conflict resolution procedures , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[12]  John Lygeros,et al.  A probabilistic approach to aircraft conflict detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[13]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Decoupled conflict-resolution procedures for decentralized air traffic control , 2011, 2009 IEEE Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control, (ISIC).

[14]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Influence of Aircraft Maneuver Preference Variability on Airspace Usage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  Antonella Ferrara,et al.  Minimum sensor second-order sliding mode longitudinal control of passenger vehicles , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  S. Puechmorel,et al.  AIR TRAFFIC COMPLEXITY : TOWARDS INTRINSIC METRICS , 2000 .

[17]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Space Partition for Conflict Resolution of Intersecting Flows of Mobile Agents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under sequential conflict resolution , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[19]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[20]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Airspace Complexity and its Application in Air Traffic Management , 1998 .

[21]  Karl D. Bilimoria,et al.  Comparison of Centralized and Decentralized Conflict Resolution Strategies for Multiple-Aircraft Problems , 2000 .

[22]  Kun Li,et al.  Modeling of traffic flow of automated vehicles , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  Maximum Flow Rates for Capacity Estimation in Level Flight with Convective Weather Constraints , 2007 .

[24]  E. Feron,et al.  Resolution of Conflicts Involving Many Aircraft via Semidefinite Programming , 2001 .

[25]  Eric Feron,et al.  Trajectory Clustering and an Application to Airspace Monitoring , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  George L. Donohue,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Airspace Complexity for Air Traffic Controller Workload-Based Sectorization , 2004 .