MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy.

MR images of the male pelvis in 55 subjects were analyzed retrospectively for depiction of the zonal anatomy of the prostate gland as related to different repetition (TR) and echo (TE) times, slice thickness, plane of imaging, chronologic age of the patient, and different magnetic field strengths. With imagers operating at 0.35 and 1.5 T, T2-based tissue-contrast images were needed for the demonstration of the internal anatomy of the prostate gland. The display of zonal anatomy was improved when continuous 0.5-cm slices were used. Evaluating sequential sections, the peripheral, central, and transition zones could be differentiated. The peripheral zone showed higher signal intensity than either the central or transition zone and was discerned in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes. The central zone was of low signal intensity and was well displayed in the coronal and sagittal planes. The central zone was seen in 31 of the 32 young men (aged 25-35 years) but in only eight of the 23 older men (aged 40 years and older). The transition zone had intrinsic MR parameters similar to the central zone, and the two could be distinguished from each other only by the knowledge of their respective anatomic location. The low-intensity transition zone blended with the periurethral glands and the preprostatic sphincter. The transition zone was of homogeneous low signal intensity in young men but varied in size and signal intensity in older men. Such a detailed display of the prostate zonal anatomy offers a unique potential for the evaluation of prostatic physiology and disease.

[1]  P. Scardino,et al.  Computed Tomography and Transabdominal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Prostate , 1977, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  C. Morgan,et al.  Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging, and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. , 1981, Radiology.

[3]  R D Williams,et al.  Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  P. Walsh,et al.  An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Weinreb,et al.  Edge Artifacts in MR Images: Chemical Shift Effect , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  F. Lee,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and staging , 1986, The Prostate.

[7]  A. J. Davidson,et al.  Computed tomography in the evaluation of the suspected carcinomatous prostate , 1980, Urologic radiology.

[8]  H. Hricak,et al.  Relative Intensity of Abdominal Organs in MR Images , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  G. Friedland Staging of genitourinary cancers. The role of diagnostic imaging , 1987, Cancer.

[10]  M J Bronskill,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. , 1985, Radiology.

[11]  J. Montie,et al.  Clinical and in vitro magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic carcinoma. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  K.,et al.  Blood flow imaging with MR: spin-phase phenomena. , 1985, Radiology.

[13]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Comparative study of suprapubic sonography and computed tomography for staging of prostatic carcinoma , 1983, Urologic radiology.