Bridging knowledge to commercialization: the good, the bad, and the challenging

This paper investigates a new emerging phenomenon in the debate of knowledge-based economic growth called “bridging knowledge to commercialization”. The paper considers commercialization of knowledge as a complex and a multi-faceted phenomenon and aims to highlight “the good”, “the bad” and “the challenging” in commercialization of knowledge from a taxonomic perspective. The paper has four objectives: (1) to examine the emerging concepts in bridging knowledge to commercialization while addressing related issues in the literature and to offer a conceptual framework on the basis of a typology of metaphores for knowledge; (2) to highlight the societal benefits of commercialization of knowledge in a regional development context; (3) to underline the value conflicts and differences in culture and perspectives in the valuation of knowledge in order to better understand the commercialization process; and (4) to highlight the challenges for academia, industry and government while describing the critical framework conditions that are needed to effectively foster commercialization of knowledge. While addressing the academic, societal, spatial, cultural and ethical implications of knowledge commercialization, the paper highlights retrospects and prospects from regional development perspective.

[1]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure , 1997 .

[2]  Devrim Göktepe-Hultén,et al.  Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation? , 2010 .

[3]  David E. Adelman,et al.  Patent Metrics: The Mismeasure of Innovation in the Biotech Patent Debate , 2006 .

[4]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[5]  L. Leydesdorff.  The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[6]  C. Hudson.  Regional Development Partnerships in Sweden: A Way for Higher Education Institutions to Develop their Role in the Processes of Regional Governance? , 2006 .

[7]  Malhar N. Kumar.  Ethical Conflicts in Commercialization of University Research in the Post–Bayh–Dole Era , 2010 .

[8]  R. Nelson,et al.  The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch-up , 2005 .

[9]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[10]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Working Through the Patent Problem , 2003, Science.

[11]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Scientist commercialization as conduit of knowledge spillovers , 2009 .

[12]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Introduction to the Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities , 1988 .

[14]  David N. Allen,et al.  Faculty Entrepreneurship in Research University Environments. , 1989 .

[15]  Kathleen R. Allen,et al.  The Creation Corridor: Environmental Load and Pre-Organization Information-Processing Ability , 1992 .

[16]  Charles Levenstein,et al.  Taking Care of Business: Citizenship and the Charter of Incorporation , 1993, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[17]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Full-Time Faculty or Part-Time Entrepreneurs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Ashley J. Stevens.  Autm Licensing Survey: Fy 2002 , 2003 .

[19]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[20]  Desmond M. Blair,et al.  Campus Companies , 2018 .

[21]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[22]  H. K. Schachman.  From “Publish or Perish” to “Patent and Prosper” , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  David Charles,et al.  Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks , 1992 .

[24]  Ernesto Tavoletti,et al.  Higher Education Excellence and Local Economic Development: The Case of the Entrepreneurial University of Twente , 2005 .

[25]  Jenny J. Lee,et al.  Faculty Entrepreneurialism and the Challenge to Undergraduate Education at Research Universities , 2004 .

[26]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[27]  M. Meyer.  Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms , 2003 .

[28]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[29]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Data Withholding and the Next Generation of Scientists: Results of a National Survey , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[31]  R. Cook-Deegan,et al.  The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome , 2005, Science.

[33]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[34]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[35]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  R&D Policy Models and Data Needs , 2001 .

[36]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[37]  N. Baldini.  The Entrepreneurial University: A Debate , 2006 .

[38]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  View from the Bench: Patents and Material Transfers , 2005, Science.

[39]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research , 1996 .

[40]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[41]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The capitalization of knowledge : a triple helix of university-industry-government , 2010 .

[42]  Robert E. Litan,et al.  Commercializing University Innovations: Alternative Approaches , 2007, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[43]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world , 1998 .

[44]  R. Nelson.  The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[45]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University Licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act , 2003, Science.

[46]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model , 2009 .

[47]  Stephen A Merrill,et al.  Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health , 2006 .

[48]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[49]  K. Frenken,et al.  The geography of research collaboration: theoretical considerations and stylized facts in biotechnology in Europe and the United States , 2005 .

[50]  Jan A. Kobus.  Universities and the Creation of Spin-off Companies , 1992 .

[51]  Joshua L. Rosenbloom.  The Geography of Innovation Commercialization in the United States During the 1990s , 2007 .

[52]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[53]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[54]  Arti K. Rai,et al.  Open and Collaborative Research: A New Model for Biomedicine , 2004 .

[55]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[56]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[58]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[59]  B. Sampat.  Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole , 2006 .

[60]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden , 2007 .

[61]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[62]  Reconciling Patent Policies with the University Mission , 2006 .

[63]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[64]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[65]  D. Palfreyman.  The Warwick way: A case study of entrepreneurship within a university context , 1989 .

[66]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Proof of concept centers: accelerating the commercialization of university innovation , 2008 .

[67]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The ethical dilemmas of university-industry collaborations , 1987 .

[68]  Mikel Gómez Uranga,et al.  The Dynamics of Commercialization of Scientific Knowledge in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[69]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[70]  R. Geiger.  The Quest For ‘Economic Relevance’ by US Research Universities , 2006 .

[71]  H. Etzkowitz.  Losing our bearings: the science policy crisis in post-Cold War Eastern Europe, former Soviet Union and USA , 1996 .

[72]  H. Buchbinder.  The market oriented university and the changing role of knowledge , 1993 .

[73]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[74]  J. M. Munson,et al.  The values of engineers and managing engineers , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[75]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter? , 2004 .

[76]  Joshua B. Powers.  R&D Funding Sources and University Technology Transfer: What Is Stimulating Universities to Be More Entrepreneurial? , 2004 .

[77]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[78]  David V. Gibson,et al.  The entrepreneurial university: the role of higher education in the United States in technology commercialization and economic development , 1993 .

[79]  A. Wasunna,et al.  Patents, Biomedical Research, and Treatments: Examining Concerns, Canvassing Solutions , 2007, The Hastings Center report.

[80]  Barbara J. Bird.  Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention , 1988 .

[81]  D. Andriessen.  Value, Valuation, and Valorisation , 2005 .

[82]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  On the metaphorical nature of intellectual capital: a textual analysis , 2005 .

[83]  Seiichiro Yamamoto,et al.  Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[84]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The capitalization of knowledge , 2010 .

[85]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe , 2007 .

[86]  Cheryl Conway,et al.  Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region's Development , 2003 .

[87]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[88]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[89]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[90]  John Ziman,et al.  Is science losing its objectivity? , 1996, Nature.

[91]  Rosemary Deem,et al.  Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important? , 2001 .

[92]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting , 2007, Scientometrics.

[93]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: A Quasi-experimental Approach , 2004 .

[94]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[95]  R. Huggins.  Universities and knowledge-based venturing: finance, management and networks in London , 2008 .

[96]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  “But Peter’s in it for the money” – the liminality of entrepreneurial scientists , 2012 .

[97]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[98]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[99]  David B. Resnik,et al.  Responsible Conduct of Research , 2002 .

[100]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[101]  R. L. Chapman,et al.  Transformation of scientists and engineers into managers , 1972 .

[102]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[103]  Jeffrey M Drazen,et al.  Institutions, contracts, and academic freedom. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[104]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Industry/University Licensing: Characteristics, Concerns and Issues from the Perspective of the Buyer , 2003 .

[105]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[106]  W. Waugh.  Conflicting Values and Cultures: The Managerial Threat to University Governance , 1998 .

[107]  A. Gouldner.  The Future Of Intellectuals And The Rise Of The New Class , 1980 .

[108]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[109]  A. Warren,et al.  Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location , 2008 .

[110]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[111]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[112]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  Science, the endless frontier : A report to the President , 2011 .

[113]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo , 2008 .

[114]  Mats A. Lundqvist,et al.  Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology , 2003 .

[115]  Teresa R. Behrens,et al.  Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .

[116]  David N. Allen,et al.  Conflicts in the Commercialization of Knowledge: Perspectives from Science and Entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[117]  W. McMullan,et al.  University innovation centres and academic venture formation , 1988 .